There is limited
evidence to suggest any major differences exist between Medicare
Advantage and traditional, fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare when measuring
beneficiary satisfaction, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation’s
(KFF) recent literature review of 62 studies comparing the two programs. Nor did
either program consistently stand out across quality measures. There were
also few differences in length of hospital stays for common ailments or
aggregate days spent in inpatient care between the two groups.
There were some
measurable differences between the two programs, however. In general, MA
members were more likely to access preventive care, such as wellness
visits and annual flu shots, and more often reported having a usual
source of care. They also fared better on some utilization measures,
reporting lower rates of home health, inpatient rehabilitation and
skilled nursing facility use. Traditional Medicare enrollees, meanwhile,
were more likely to be treated in facilities with high quality ratings.
Notably, traditional Medicare enrollees with supplemental coverage
reported fewer cost-related difficulties than MA members.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment