Reprinted from MEDICARE ADVANTAGE NEWS, biweekly news and
business strategies about Medicare Advantage plans, product design, marketing,
enrollment, market expansions, CMS audits, and countless federal initiatives in
MA and Medicaid managed care.
By Lauren
Flynn Kelly, Managing Editor
May 25, 2017 Volume 23 Issue 10
CMS’s annual report summarizing activities for the prior audit
year — released several months earlier than usual — contained some
“encouraging” results, such as improved performance in the Part D program areas
of Formulary and Benefit Administration (FA) and Coverage Determinations,
Appeals, and Grievances (CDAG), observed a CMS official who spoke during a May
11 session of the Medicare Advantage and Prescription Drug Plan Audit and
Enforcement Conference. However, the report showed that plan sponsors continued
to be cited for the same mistakes, particularly in Part D, and suggested a
correlation between the number of formularies a sponsor operates and its audit
score, observed Greg McDonald with the Division of Analysis, Policy and
Strategy in the Medicare Parts C & D Oversight and Enforcement Group.
The 2016 Program Audit and Enforcement Report, posted May 9,
observed a notable decrease in audit scores (i.e., improved performance) from
2015 to 2016, with the largest percentage drops in FA and CDAG. McDonald noted
that this improvement was partly attributable to changes in the way CMS defines
“immediate corrective action required” (ICAR), “corrective action required”
(CAR) and observations. For example, ICARs now necessitate an “access-to-care
issue,” so removing certain things that would formerly have qualified as an
ICAR could have lowered scores, he suggested.
Nevertheless, McDonald said CMS continued to see the same “common
conditions” in both drug-related program areas as well as in Part C
Organization Determinations, Appeals, and Grievances (ODAG) as it has in
previous years. In CDAG, this included a sponsor’s failure to appropriately
auto-forward coverage determinations and/or redeterminations (standard and/or
expedited) to the Independent Review Entity (IRE) for review and disposition
within the CMS required timeframe, which has been cited as a common condition
in five out of seven program audit years since 2011 and is an area of
increasing concern (see story, p. 1).
The report also highlighted the top 10 conditions cited as ICARs
in 2015 and 2016; two were in CDAG, three were in FA and five were in ODAG. The
most common condition was also a failure to appropriately auto-forward coverage
determinations and/or redeterminations to the IRE within the required
timeframe, which necessitated immediate corrective action 21 times.
Included in this year’s audit report for the first time was a look
at the relationship between audit scores and formulary count in ODAG and FA.
CMS split scores for each area across audited sponsors into two groups: those
that operate one formulary and those that operate more than one, and found that
those with only one formulary had lower (better) scores on average in both FA
and CDAG, with a greater difference in FA. CMS suggested this finding may be
“attributable to difficulties associated with managing multiple formularies and
monitoring and correcting compliance issues.” CMS did not, however, detect any
relationship between the number of Part C First Tier, Downstream and Related
Entities that audited sponsors had in 2016 and their ODAG audit scores.
CMS in 2016 and early 2017 imposed a total of 21 enforcement
actions that resulted in civil monetary penalties amounting to $7.5 million,
with an average of $357,756 per CMP (see table, this page). These included 17
enforcement actions based on non-compliance observed in 2016 program audits,
which did not result in any intermediate sanctions or for-cause terminations.
Excluding three sponsors fined for inaccurate or late Annual Notice of
Change/Evidence of Coverage documents and one for marketing misrepresentation,
CMPs stemming from 2016 program audit findings totaled nearly $7.3 million,
compared with almost $8.5 million imposed on 12 MA and Part D sponsors in 2015
and early 2016.
View the report at http://tinyurl.com/n5emdlt.
MA and Part D Sponsors Receiving a CMP Based on
2016 Referrals
Date of Imposition
|
Organization Name
|
Basis for Referral
|
CMP Amount
|
May 26, 2016
|
Clover Health
|
Marketing Misrepresentation
|
$106,095
|
Aug. 9, 2016
|
Blue Cross of Idaho Care Plus,
Inc.
|
Inaccurate ANOC/EOC
|
$102,820
|
Aug. 9, 2016
|
AgeWell New York, LLC
|
Late and Inaccurate ANOC/EOC
|
$3,325
|
Sept. 8, 2016
|
Express Scripts Medicare
|
Late ANOC/EOC
|
$5,325
|
Oct. 11, 2016
|
Health Care Service Corp.
|
2016 Program Audit
|
$115,625
|
Oct. 11, 2016
|
Healthfirst, Inc.
|
2016 Program Audit
|
$38,125
|
Oct. 11, 2016
|
Fallon Community Heatlh Plan
|
2016 Program Audit
|
$348,900
|
Nov. 21, 2016
|
Caidan Enterprises, Inc.
|
2016 Program Audit
|
$57,715
|
Nov. 21, 2016
|
Health Plan of San Mateo
|
2016 Program Audit
|
$49,725
|
Nov. 21, 2016
|
Health Partners Plans, Inc.
|
2016 Program Audit
|
$32,600
|
Nov. 22, 2016
|
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
|
2016 Program Audit
|
$2,498,850
|
Jan. 12, 2017
|
AvMed, Inc.
|
2016 Program Audit
|
$764,375
|
Jan. 12, 2017
|
Presbyterian Healthcare Services
|
2016 Program Audit
|
$775,375
|
Jan. 12, 2017
|
Centene Corp.
|
2016 Program Audit
|
$31,950
|
Feb. 23, 2017
|
FirstHealth of the Carolinas, Inc.
|
2016 Focused Program Audit
|
$28,975
|
Feb. 23, 2017
|
Independent Care Health Plan, Inc.
|
2016 Focused Program Audit
|
$321,900
|
Feb. 23, 2017
|
MVP Health Care, Inc.
|
2016 Program Audit
|
$85,200
|
Feb. 23, 2017
|
WellCare Health Plans, Inc.
|
2016 Program Audit
|
$1,174,300
|
Feb. 24, 2017
|
CommunityCare Managed Healthcare
Plans of OK, Inc.
|
2016 Program Audit
|
$760,500
|
Feb. 24, 2017
|
PH Holdings, LLC
|
2016 Program Audit
|
$83,250
|
Feb. 24, 2017
|
SCAN Health Plan
|
2016 Program Audit
|
$127,950
|
ANOC/EOC = Annual Notice of
Change/Evidence of Coverage
CMP = civil monetary penalty
SOURCE: Annual Report from CMS’s
Medicare Parts C and D Oversight and Enforcement Group, Published May 9, 2017
|
No comments:
Post a Comment