By Fred Schulte July
6, 2017
When Sol Shipotow
enrolled in a new Medicare Advantage health plan earlier this year, he expected
to keep the doctor who treats his serious eye condition.
“That
turned out not to be so,” said Shipotow, 83, who lives in Bensalem, Pa.
Shipotow
said he had to scramble to get back on a health plan he could afford and that
his longtime eye specialist would accept. “You have to really understand your
policy,” he said. “I thought it was the same coverage.”
Boosters
say that privately run Medicare Advantage plans, which enroll about one-third
of all people eligible for Medicare, offer good value. They strive to keep
patients healthy by coordinating their medical care through cost-conscious
networks of doctors and hospitals.
But
some critics argue the plans can prove risky for seniors in poor or declining
health, or those like Shipotow who need to see specialists, because they often
face hurdles getting access.
A
recent report by the Government Accountability
Office, the auditing arm of Congress, adds new weight to criticisms that some
health plans may leave sicker patients worse off.
The
GAO report, released this spring, reviewed 126 Medicare Advantage plans and
found that 35 of them had disproportionately high numbers of sicker people
dropping out. Patients cited difficulty with access to “preferred doctors and
hospitals” or other medical care, as the leading reasons for leaving.
“People
who are sicker are much more likely to leave (Medicare Advantage plans) than
people who are healthier,” James Cosgrove, director of the GAO’s health care
analysis, said in explaining the research.
David
Lipschutz, an attorney at the Center for Medicare Advocacy,
says the GAO findings were alarming and should prompt tighter government
oversight.
“A
Medicare Advantage plan sponsor does not have an evergreen right to participate
in and profit from the Medicare program, particularly if it is providing poor
care,” Lipschutz says.
The
GAO did not name the 35 health plans, though it urged federal health officials
to consider a large exodus from a plan as a possible sign of substandard care.
Most of the 35 health plans were relatively small, with 15,000 members or
fewer, and had received poor scores on other government quality measures, the
report said. Two dozen plans saw 1 in 5 patients leave in 2014, much higher
turnover than normal, the GAO found.
Medicare
Advantage plans now treat more than 19 million patients, and are expected to
grow as record numbers of baby boomers reach retirement age.
Kristine
Grow, a spokeswoman for America’s Health Insurance Plans, an industry trade
group, says Medicare Advantage keeps expanding because most people who sign up
are satisfied with the care they receive.
She
says that patients in the GAO study mostly switched from one health plan to
another because they got a better deal, either through cheaper or more
inclusive coverage.
Grow
says many Medicare Advantage plans offer members extra benefits not covered by
standard Medicare, such as fitness club memberships or vision or dental care,
and do a better job of coordinating medical care to keep people active and out
of hospitals.
“We
have to remember these are plans working hard to deliver the best care they
can,” Grow says. Insurers compete vigorously for business and “want to keep
members for the long term,” she adds.
Some
seniors, wary of problems ahead, are choosing to go with traditional Medicare
coverage. Pittsburgh resident Marcy Grupp says she mulled over proposals from
Medicare Advantage plans but worried she might need orthopedic or other
specialized health care and wanted the freedom to go to any doctor or hospital.
She’s decided on standard Medicare coverage and paid for a “Medigap” policy to
pick up any uncovered charges.
“Everything
is already in place,” says Grupp, a former administrative assistant who turns
65 this month.
The
GAO report on Medicare Advantage comes as federal officials are ramping up
fines and other penalties against errant health plans.
In
the first two months of this year, for instance, the federal Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services fined 10 Medicare
Advantage health plans a total of more than $4.1 million for alleged misconduct
that “delayed or denied access” to covered benefits, mostly prescription drugs.
In
some of these cases, health plans charged patients too much for drugs or failed
to advise them of their right to appeal denials of medical services, according
to government records. Industry watchers predict more penalties are to come.
Last
month, CMS officials ended a 16-month ban on enrollment in Cigna Corp.’s
Medicare Advantage plans. CMS took the action after citing Cigna for
“widespread and systematic failures” to provide necessary medical care and
prescription drugs, policies officials called a “serious threat to enrollee
health and safety.”
A
flurry of whistleblower lawsuits have surfaced, too. In late May, Freedom
Health, a Florida Medicare Advantage insurer, agreed to pay nearly
$32 million to settle allegations that it exaggerated how sick some patients
were to boost profits, while getting rid of others who cost a lot to treat.
Freedom
Health allegedly kept a list of some “unprofitable” patients that it
discouraged from staying in the health plan, while encouraging healthier, “more
profitable” members to remain, according to the whistleblower suit. Federal
regulations prohibit health plans from discriminating based on a person’s
health.
Asked
by Kaiser Health News for comment, Freedom Health corporate counsel Bijal Patel
emailed a statement that read, in part: “We agreed to resolve the case so that
we can continue focusing on providing excellent care.”
Casey
Schwarz, a lawyer with the Medicare Rights Center, a consumer service
organization, notes that health plans are required to have a formal process for
patients to appeal denials of medical services. She says patients should know
their rights and insist on them.
“We
want people to vote with their feet and leave plans not serving them,” Schwarz
says.
KHN’s
coverage related to aging & improving care of older adults is supported
by The John A. Hartford Foundation.
A bit of a one-sided article. Most agents are very good at reviewing network requirements of enrollees into MA plans, and while all physicians or other providers are not part of every network, the care is there. With the median income of a Medicare beneficiary at about $24,000/year, many cannot afford to stay in traditional Medicare, with the financial holes in its coverage and the cost of traditional Medigap plans, plus the expense of a standalone Part D plan. There just isn't a simple single answer that applies to all people.
ReplyDelete