Updated Brief Tracks Rise in
Workers’ Out-of-Pocket Insurance Costs
A new Kaiser Family Foundation analysis finds about one in four people (24%) covered by
large employer plans spent more than $1,000 out-of-pocket on health care in
2015, an increase of seven percentage points from 17 percent in 2005.
About 1 in 10 people in such plans (12%) paid more
than $2,000 out-of-pocket in 2015, a distribution that mirrors the distribution
of overall health spending, according to the new analysis of claims data.
Dollar amounts in the analysis are inflation-adjusted to 2015 dollars.
In addition to overall
trends, the analysis also examines gender and age of high spenders, as well as
differences in out-of-pocket health expenditures across diseases. It finds:
- Among large-group enrollees spending more than $1,000
out-of-pocket in 2015, 59 percent were women, and 41 percent were men.
- Older enrollees were more likely than younger enrollees
to spend more than $1,000 out-of-pocket.
- In 2015, average annual out-of-pocket spending for
large-group enrollees diagnosed with common cancers ($1,510) and all
circulatory diseases ($1,508) was nearly twice that for all enrollees
($778).
Additionally, an updated version of another analysis tracks a continuing trend of rising
out-of-pocket costs outpacing costs paid by insurers for workers covered by
their employer’s health plans.
The update finds that between 2005 and 2015, covered
workers’ average out-of-pocket costs grew 66 percent, compared to health plans’
average payment per enrollee, which rose by 56 percent. Wages, meanwhile, rose
by 31 percent during that period. Overall, workers’ out-of-pocket costs rose
from an average of $469 in 2005 to $778 in 2015, while average payment by
health plans rose from $2,932 to $4,563.
The chart collection, related brief, and updated analysis are available on the Peterson-Kaiser
Health System Tracker.
Filling the need for trusted information on
national health issues, the Kaiser Family Foundation is a nonprofit organization based in Menlo
Park, California.
No comments:
Post a Comment