Friday, April 27, 2018

CMS Proposes New Diagnoses, RAPS/EDS Blend for Risk Scoring


Reprinted from MEDICARE ADVANTAGE NEWS, biweekly news and business strategies about Medicare Advantage plans, product design, marketing, enrollment, market expansions, CMS audits, and countless federal initiatives in MA and Medicaid managed care. 

By Lauren Flynn Kelly, Managing Editor
January 4, 2018Volume 24Issue 1
CMS late last month gave Medicare Advantage organizations an early look at changes to the Part C risk adjustment model and the use of encounter data in determining risk scores with the release of Part 1 of the 2019 Advance Notice of Methodological Changes for MA Capitation Rates and Part D Payment Policies. In addition to proposing new codes to account for mental health, substance use disorder and the severity of chronic kidney disease conditions — which CMS was mandated to explore in the 21st Century Cures Act — the Advance Notice proposed increasing the use of encounter data as a diagnosis source for 2019.
Because of requirements in the Cures Act, CMS is publishing the Advance Notice in two parts this year, with the first component containing changes to the CMS Hierarchical Condition Category (HCC) risk adjustment model that must have a 60-day comment period. The second part of the Advance Notice, which will include changes to other payment methodologies proposed for 2019 that require only 30 days for comment, will be released no later than the statutory deadline of Jan. 31.
The Cures Act required CMS to, among other things, allow beneficiaries with end-stage renal disease to enter the MA program and assess the impact of including in the risk adjustment model additional diagnosis codes related to mental health and substance use disorders as well as the severity of chronic kidney disease (MAN 12/15/16, p. 1). According to the Advance Notice posted Dec. 27, 2017, CMS proposed to refine the CMS-HCC risk adjustment model by incorporating several new HCCs pertaining to mental health, substance use disorder and chronic kidney disease.
Additionally, CMS proposed to add diagnoses to the existing Drug/Alcohol Dependence code (HCC 55) to “better account for the costs related to accidental (unintentional) or undetermined overdose” and rename it “Drug/Alcohol Dependence, or Abuse/Use with Complications.”
“The new HCC codes incent MA plans to focus on HHS priorities — particularly recognizing and treating substance abuse,” remarks Michael Adelberg, a principal with FaegreBD Consulting and a former top CMS MA official. “While not unexpected, this is good news for pretty much all stakeholders.”
CMS Considers Condition Count Options
The Cures Act also required that CMS consider the total number of diseases or conditions an enrollee has when making changes to the risk adjustment model. As a result, CMS in the Advance Notice proposed the “Payment Condition Count model,” which takes into account the number of conditions that an individual beneficiary has, only among the conditions that are included in the payment model. CMS in the document also discussed as an alternative the “All Condition Count model,” which considers all conditions that a beneficiary has, including both those in the payment model and those not in the model. CMS said it welcomes comment on which model would be most appropriate and the clinical considerations regarding the most appropriate model.
In keeping with a requirement in the Cures Act that CMS fully phase in the risk adjustment changes by 2022, CMS proposed starting with a blend of 75% of the model used for payment in 2017 and 2018 and 25% of the proposed Payment Condition Count model for 2019. That mix would change to 50/50 for 2020 and 25/75 for 2021 before reaching 100% of the Payment Condition Count model for 2022, according to the document.
CMS estimated that the Payment Condition Count model would raise MA risk scores by 1.1% on average, while the All Condition Count model would lower MA risk scores by 0.28% (see charts, pp. 3 and 4). Under the former, the change in MA contracts’ risk scores is generally positive and less varied than the latter, added CMS.
Proposed Model Would Boost Payments
“The immediate impact is minor in 2019, but the adoption of the proposed [Payment Condition Count] model would be generally positive for Medicare Advantage plans, as the average estimated impact is positive on risk scores (boosting reimbursement) and there isn’t significant variation in impact at the contract level (though some contracts could still see a negative impact),” observed securities analyst Michael Newshel in a Dec. 28 research note from Evercore ISI.
Although not mandated by the Cures Act, CMS in the Advance Notice also proposed for payment year 2019 calculating risk scores using a blend of 25% of the risk score derived from encounter data and fee-for-service diagnoses and 75% of the risk score calculated with diagnoses from the old risk adjustment payment system (RAPS) and FFS diagnoses.
CMS in 2012 began collecting data from MAOs through the encounter data system and in 2016 began phasing in EDS-based payments, beginning with 10% of the payment based on EDS scoring, while the other 90% came from RAPS, which relies on a much less complex set of data elements. CMS’s intent was to advance to a 50/50 mix for 2017, but it revised the blend to 25% EDS/75% RAPS after hearing the concerns of stakeholders about plan readiness and the quality of the data coming from providers (MAN 4/3/16, p. 1). CMS in the 2018 Advance Notice proposed keeping that same blend but in the final payment notice walked it back even further to 15% EDS/85% RAPS (MAN 4/13/17, p. 1).
Comments on the proposed changes are due by March 2.
View Part 1 of the 2019 Advance Notice under the “Announcements and Documents” page at https://tinyurl.com/y7eg3hom.
Estimated Change in MA Contract-Level Risk Scores Using the Payment Condition Count Model
The following chart displays the estimated percent change in payment for 446 Medicare Advantage contracts if CMS were to adopt the proposed Payment Condition Count model, which takes into account the number of conditions that an individual beneficiary has, only among the conditions that are included in the payment model.
Estimated Change in MA Contract-Level Risk Scores Using the Payment Condition Count Model
SOURCE: Part 1 of the 2019 Advance Notice of Methodological Changes for MA Capitation Rates and Part D Payment Policies, released by CMS on Dec. 27, 2017.
Estimated Change in MA Contract-Level Risk Scores Using the All Condition Count Model
The following chart displays the estimated percent change in payment for 446 Medicare Advantage contracts if CMS were to adopt the All Condition Count model, which takes into account all conditions that a beneficiary has, including both those in the payment model and those not in the model.
Estimated Change in MA Contract-Level Risk Scores Using the Payment Condition Count Model
SOURCE: Part 1 of the 2019 Advance Notice of Methodological Changes for MA Capitation Rates and Part D Payment Policies, released by CMS on Dec. 27, 2017.

No comments:

Post a Comment