(Full Disclosure: To
avoid ex post rationalization or excess reaction to the results, this
Eakinomics was written yesterday afternoon before the polls closed.)
There has been a lot of media huffing and puffing about the 2018 midterms. But
from a policy perspective, there was not much at stake. The Trump
Administration has little in the way of a legislative agenda that would be at
risk of a Democratic takeover in the House. The only item that comes to mind is
Tax Reform 2.0 — making permanent the individual provisions of the Tax Cuts and
Jobs Act, and other provisions. That has some political significance — the
president and the Ways and Means chairman committed to it in the weeks
leading up to the election — but will matter little for the economic
outlook. In the other direction, the takeover of the House by Democrats
ostensibly would raise the odds of an infrastructure initiative, but the
reality is that there is no budgetary room for a big spending bill, and the
Democrats have blanched at the administration’s efforts at privatized
financing.
Instead, for better or worse, the bulk of the policymaking will continue to be
executive actions on trade, immigration, regulation, drug pricing, net
neutrality, labor market rules, and the like.
Looking forward, the most significant economic elections are the governorships.
Governors can be key allies in carrying states during the 2020 presidential
election — and a switch from Trump’s pro-growth populism to the Democrats’
no-growth progressivism does matter.
No comments:
Post a Comment