Jonathan
Keisling August 9, 2019
With this week’s news that the
House Committee on Ways and Means is putting together legislation to
reduce surprise billing, there are
now likely to be four different (yet similar) bills aimed at
combating surprise billing. One of the more niche problems that a couple
of these bills seek to solve is that of surprise bills for air ambulance
transport. It’s worth considering the nature of the air ambulance market to see
what kinds of policies might work.
According to the Government Accountability Office (GAO),
about 69 percent of air ambulance trips are out of network for the privately
insured. The median charge for
out-of-network trips was greater than $36,000 in 2017, although we do not know
how much the patients were responsible for paying. Not only are air ambulance trips expensive, but the market for these
services is also very concentrated. The GAO found that, as of 2015,
three companies own roughly two thirds of all air-ambulance helicopters
nationally. Because there are so few providers, and because ambulance services
are unpredictable, air ambulance
providers have little incentive to contract with insurers: One large
company reported that it contracted with less than 1 percent of the 1,000
private insurers it works with per year. And because there are such high fixed costs for air ambulance
providers (helicopters, planes, training, etc.), high prices do not
necessarily encourage more entrants into the market.
The air ambulance
market is clearly unique in some ways, and policies must account for these
unique factors to be successful. For example, in S. 1895,
which the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee produced, the
solution for all surprise out-of-network bills (including for air ambulance
services) is to charge the patient the in-network rate while allowing insurers
to pay their in-network rate for the same or a similar service. If the insurer
doesn’t have a negotiated rate for the service, it can pay a rate similar to
the prevailing one in that area. (To learn more about the various proposals for
surprise billing, you can read my recent paper.)
Under the system laid out by this bill, however,
it’s highly likely that there would be many geographic areas where there would
not be a single negotiated rate between a private insurer and an air ambulance
company. In these instances, the geographic area would have to be expanded
until a rate for the area can be established, potentially allowing the rate set
for services hundreds of miles away to dictate the rate for all areas in
between.
The state of Wyoming recently proposed a
different approach to this problem. Last week, Wyoming proposed expanding
Medicaid to cover air ambulances for all Wyoming residents. In essence,
Wyoming’s plan would treat air ambulances like a public utility. Medicaid would
determine statewide requirements for air ambulance coverage, rates would be
determined through a non-benchmarked competitive bidding process, and the state
would make periodic flat payments to providers and set cost-sharing
requirements for patients.
It’s unsurprising that Wyoming would produce a
waiver proposal like this. As
states go, Wyoming has one of the more unique relationships with air ambulances.
Because the state’s population is spread out over so much land, air ambulances
are used more in Wyoming relative to other states. According to GAO data,
Wyoming has seven times as many air ambulance bases per capita than the United
States as a whole, while Wyoming bases serve 40 percent fewer people per base
than the national average.
Though Wyoming represents a unique case among
states, its proposal represents a
creative solution to a market failure. State intervention could, perhaps
ironically, inject competition into a market that currently lacks it, and the
proposal also avoids rate setting, an added bonus. The proposal would need to overcome a host of barriers to become law—and
even more complications if it were to be approved—but the proposed policy would
address the unique challenges posed by air ambulances.
https://www.americanactionforum.org/weekly-checkup/flying-into-surprise-bills/#ixzz5wR33A1yr
Follow @AAF on Twitter
Follow @AAF on Twitter
No comments:
Post a Comment