The
agency says that shared decision-making is an essential part of creating more
patient-centered care and must be a part of quality of care standards.
By Sara Heath
March
13, 2018 - The National Quality Forum (NQF) is calling for healthcare
experts and policymakers to integrate shared decision-making as a standard of care.
Shared decision-making helps support better patient engagement and integrates
the patient as a member of the care team, the group said.
“Even
though patients have access to more healthcare information than ever before, in
reality, they often may not fully understand important (basic) information
about the risks and benefits of treatments and alternatives, and even if they
do, they often are not given the opportunity by their clinicians to provide
meaningful input into their healthcare decisions,” said Maureen Corry, senior
advisor for Childbirth Connection programs at the National Partnership for
Women & Families, and co-chair of the National Quality Partners (NQP)
Shared Decision Making Action Team.
Shared
decision-making is the practice by which providers educate patients and subsequently
elicit patient viewpoints and preferences for care. This practice integrates
the patient into the care team and often results in more patient satisfaction
and better outcomes.
Most
clinicians use decision aids to support their shared decision-making efforts,
NQF explained. Decision aids are materials that review the patient health
condition and offer the pros and cons of various treatment options. These tools
help patients choose the best treatment path for their physical and emotional
needs.
With
that call to action, NQF also published the National
Quality Partners Playbook™: Shared Decision Making in Healthcare.
“Advancing
the standard of care in this nation demands patient engagement, and that starts
with the one-on-one conversations between patients and their providers,” said
Shantanu Agrawal, MD, MPhil, president and CEO of the National Quality Forum.
“The NQP Playbook offers a strategic approach that healthcare
organizations can use to help ensure this communication is effective.”
The
playbook covers the following topics:
·
Educating patients and families about what to expect from
providers in the process
·
Advancing healthcare team knowledge and training to foster
high-quality shared decision making
·
Applying technology and other investments to help integrate
shared decision making into the care delivery process
·
Implementing mechanisms to monitor patient, clinician, and
healthcare team engagement in shared decision making
·
Establishing accountability and incentives for this engagement
The
playbook also includes example scenarios for using shared decision-making,
the potential pitfalls that may arise, solutions
for overcoming challenges, and tools that can help support shared
decision-making in healthcare.
The
playbook aims to assist providers through shared decision-making, especially
when the practice becomes complicated by the many mitigating factors in a
healthcare encounter.
“With
many quality and performance priorities, and an evolving payment and care
delivery landscape, many healthcare organizations and clinicians face
challenges and need simple guidance to integrate SDM into busy clinical workflows,”
NQF wrote in a summary of the playbook. “In some
cases, high-quality, unbiased, evidence-based patient decision aids may add
value to the SDM process.”
The
guide also outlines the six foundational principles of shared decision-making
in healthcare. These principles will help guide providers through the process
of shared decision-making and should support the role that patients play in
their own health:
·
Leadership and culture in healthcare organizations
·
Enhance patient education and understanding
·
Provide healthcare team knowledge and training
·
Take concrete actions
·
Track, monitor, and report clinician and team engagement
·
Establish accountability
The NQF
playbook also touched upon the issue of reimbursement for shared
decision-making.
“Payment
is a strong incentive to stimulate change,” the playbook summary explained.
“While some employers and health plans currently pay for SDM, others could
consider reimbursing for SDM and advancing the use of patient decision aids
that meet the National Standards for the Certification of Patient Decision
Aids.”
NQF
developed the playbook in partnership with the NQF Shared Decision Making
Action Team. The team consisted of public- and private-sector healthcare
professionals. These team members also served on an informative panel that
included patient partners, clinicians, healthcare organizations, specialty
societies, and federal agencies.
As
healthcare evolves to become more patient-centric, healthcare professionals are
tapping strategies for integrating the patient into care. NQF has asserted that
shared decision-making is not only a good tool for patient-centered care, but
an essential part of a quality care encounter.
“Only
by working in partnership can clinicians and patients identify patient values,
goals, and preferences and make informed decisions about treatment and care,”
NQF wrote in the summary of its playbook. “This model of two-way
communication—known as shared decision making (SDM)—is critical to improving
person-centered care.”
https://patientengagementhit.com/news/nqf-publishes-playbook-on-shared-decision-making-in-healthcare
No comments:
Post a Comment