|
October
21, 2019
By Seema Verma, Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
The Future of Medicare Program Integrity
Earlier this month,
President Trump announced an Executive Order charging CMS to propose
annual changes to combat waste, fraud, and abuse in the Medicare program.
That’s why I’m proud to announce our vision to modernize our program
integrity methods to better protect taxpayers from fraud, waste and abuse in
Medicare. Every dollar spent on Medicare comes from American taxpayers and
must not be misused.
CMS defines program
integrity very simply: “pay it right.” Program integrity must focus on
paying the right amount, to legitimate providers, for covered, reasonable and
necessary services provided to eligible beneficiaries while taking aggressive
actions to eliminate fraud, waste and abuse. Our health care programs are
quickly evolving; therefore our program integrity strategy must keep pace to
address emerging challenges.
Government watchdogs routinely
identify concerns about waste and abuse within our programs. The Government
Accountability Office (GAO) has designated Medicare as a High Risk program
since 1990 because of its size, complexity and susceptibility to improper
payments. In 2018, improper payments accounted for 5% of the total $616.8
billion of Medicare's net costs. While CMS regularly implements GAO
recommendations, sometimes we lack the tools or capabilities to integrate
worthy suggestions. The Medicare Fee-For-Service (FFS) program is limited by
statute as to what methods can be used to prevent fraud, waste, and
abuse. For example, last year’s President’s budget contained a
legislative proposal to expand review of high risk areas in FFS. Under
current statute, review is limited to durable medical equipment like
wheelchairs. In contrast, other programs like Medicaid, Medicare Advantage,
Medicare Prescription Drug Plans (PDPs), Tricare, Marketplace plans, and
private insurers all have broad authority to review procedures for medical
necessity and appropriateness. GAO has also recommended that Congress expand
prior authorization in FFS.
As our programs become
more complex, program integrity risks become increasingly difficult to
recognize. New provider types have entered the program, including hospices,
home health agencies, and federally qualified health centers. CMS has
implemented a number of value-based payment programs that have improved
quality and managed cost, but also bring new challenges in identifying
improper payments, beneficiary safety and quality issues, and other program
integrity concerns. More challenging cross-ownership issues have
emerged, such as one corporate parent owning various providers and provider
types. Increasingly complex webs of affiliations can allow unscrupulous
providers to simply appear, disappear if they come under scrutiny, and then
re-appear as “new” entities.
Medicare’s transformation
has raised the stakes of program integrity to historically high levels --
taxpayers have more to lose than ever before from those who would, whether by
negligence or by intent, improperly seek payment from our programs.
They necessitate a paradigm shift in how we approach program integrity.
When Medicare was signed
into law 54 years ago, there were only 19 million beneficiaries. Today, there
are almost 61 million and we are adding 10,000 new enrollees every day.
When the programs began, Medicare and Medicaid accounted for only 2.3% of
Federal spending.
These government programs now account for 23.5% of Federal
spending. We have witnessed exponential growth in the number and types of
providers included, the types of benefits available, the number of claims
processed and paid, and, perhaps most importantly, the number of dollars
involved.
Medicare’s improper
payment rates have declined but remain too high. That’s why CMS is developing
a five-pillar program integrity strategy to modernize our approach and
protect Medicare for future generations.
CMS integrates various
processes to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities before exposure to protect
proactively people with Medicare. For example, to mitigate risks during the
recent efforts to send new Medicare cards to beneficiaries, CMS implemented
an enhanced address validation process to verify beneficiaries’ identities
and addresses against multiple information sources. This ensured that we
mailed new Medicare cards to the right person at the right address. We
reviewed over 61 million cards for address accuracy, which we estimate saved
billions of dollars in fraudulent claim payments.
An important aspect of
fraud prevention is having various sources of information. CMS relies on
important partnerships to share data and information that help narrow down on
potential areas of concern. One of our most critical relationships is the
Healthcare Fraud Prevention Partnership (HFPP). This is a voluntary,
public-private partnership between Federal government, state and local
agencies, law enforcement, private health insurance plans, employer
organizations, and healthcare anti-fraud associations that come together to
collaboratively identify and reduce fraud, waste, and abuse across the healthcare
sector. We use this partnership for stakeholder engagement and to share
information and leads across partners. The leads are used to conduct various
studies and the results help CMS identify potential issues that may not have
otherwise been caught. Currently there are 144 partners and counting. The
more members we have, the more data is gathered, and the better insights we
have into fraud across the entire healthcare system.
We are also addressing
potential healthcare fraud by targeting high-risk areas and implementing
policy changes. In September, CMS issued a first-of-its-kind final rule, Program
Integrity Enhancements to the Provider Enrollment Process (CMS-6058-FC),
which will reduce criminal behavior across our programs. This rule applies
proactive methods to keep unscrupulous providers and suppliers out of Medicare
and Medicaid from the outset and enhances our ability to promptly identify
and act on instances of improper behavior – helping us to stop fraud before
it happens. It creates several new revocation and denial authorities to
bolster CMS’ efforts to stop fraud, waste and abuse. Importantly, a new
“affiliations” authority in the rule allows CMS to identify individuals and
organizations that pose an undue risk of fraud, waste or abuse based on their
relationships with other previously sanctioned entities. This rule marks a
critical step forward in CMS’ longstanding fight to end “pay and chase” in
Federal healthcare fraud efforts and replace it with smart, effective and
proactive measures.
Looking forward, we are
looking to add private sector technology tools to complement our fraud
prevention analytics so our future capabilities will be faster, smarter and
more robust.
We also are using
demonstrations to test new approaches for high vulnerability services such as
home health. The Review Choice Demonstration for Home Health Services
illustrates how CMS is working proactively to identify and prevent fraud in
an area with high improper payment rates while minimizing unnecessary
provider burden. The demonstration helps ensure that the right payments are
made at the right time for home health services but allows providers the
flexibility to choose what works best for them. This protects Medicare funding
from improper payments, reduces the number of Medicare appeals, and improves
provider compliance with Medicare program requirements. In response to
stakeholder feedback, this demonstration incorporates more flexibility and
choice for providers on how their claims are reviewed, as well as risk-based
changes to reduce burden on providers demonstrating compliance with Medicare
home health policies.
More recently, Medicare
Advantage enrollment continues to grow and we have added many value-based payment
programs as part of our strategy to improve how healthcare is delivered and
paid for in the Medicare program. New payment models have been very
beneficial but also have the potential to cause new challenges in identifying
improper payments, beneficiary safety issues, and other program integrity
concerns. CMS is continuing to explore ways to identify and reduce
program integrity risks related to value-based payment programs by looking to
experts in the healthcare community for lessons learned and best practices.
The TPE program has also
highlighted provider burden and confusing policies. The Medicare
documentation requirements appear in various locations and on separate
websites, causing burden to providers who must navigate the various websites
to find coverage rules, including documentation and prior authorization
requirements. That’s why CMS is collaborating with ongoing industry efforts
to streamline workflow access to coverage requirements, starting with
developing a prototype Medicare FFS Documentation Requirement Lookup Service.
This initiative will allow providers to discover Medicare FFS prior
authorization and documentation requirements at the time of service and
within their EHR.
The initiatives above are
a few of many projects we have to reduce provider burden. For example, we’re
proposing to eliminate “certification statements” for some hospital
transfers. These statements add time and burden and are often duplicative
with other required documents. In addition, we’re changing our practices to
focus more on problematic billing, not all billing. For example, we’re
proposing to reduce DMEPOS prior authorization for some providers who
demonstrate good billing practices. If they do a good job, we don’t need to
make them jump through more hoops because others may not.
CMS also has vigorous
provider screening and enrollment tools at our disposal to prevent fraud
schemes. However, we believe that there is a tremendous opportunity for the
Federal government and private plans to improve the provider enrollment
experience. CMS is currently exploring ways to centralize screening and
continuous monitoring for all payers. Cumulatively, these efforts are
defining a new approach to program integrity that reduces burden and
increases education to achieve a better shared understanding of how the
programs operate.
We currently use
sophisticated systems such as the Fraud Prevention System, and case
management systems that use predictive analytics to identify abnormal trends
and billing patterns, investigate abnormalities to find the root cause, act
quickly to address any potential fraud, and capture fraudulent behavior.
While these systems have helped us to obtain a positive return on investment,
we believe that by adopting cutting edge technology – such as AI and machine
learning tools -- we can achieve greater savings for taxpayers and allow us
to review more claims. These innovations could be used in both our current
payment models, as well as in new payment models.
RFI: Using Advanced
Technology in Program Integrity: https://www.cms.gov/About-CMS/Components/CPI/Downloads/Center-for-Program-Integrity-Advanced-Technology-RFI.pdf
The
Future of Medicare Program Integrity
As part of CMS’s program
integrity strategy to leverage new technology, CMS seeks to hear from
providers, innovators, and private insurers on ways CMS can advance and
modernize efforts to combat Medicare fraud, waste, and abuse (FWA) through
innovation. Today CMS is issuing two Requests for Information (RFIs) asking
for input from the healthcare community on the program integrity challenges
involved in the transition from a fee-for-service system to value based care.
We are also requesting input on new techniques and approaches involving
advanced data analytics and artificial intelligence. During the RFI comment
period, CMS will be holding a series of listening sessions across the country
soliciting ideas and feedback on how to tackle the enduring issues plaguing
our efforts to “pay it right.”
Simply stated, CMS must
elevate program integrity, unleash the power of modern private sector
innovation, prevent rather than chase fraud waste and abuse through smart,
proactive measures, and unburden our provider partners so they can do what
they do best – put patients first. For these very important reasons, we
seek and welcome input and expertise from all stakeholders on how to best
improve our program integrity strategy and tools as we strive to protect both
taxpayer dollars and the health and well-being of beneficiaries.
RFI: The Future of Program
Integrity: https://www.cms.gov/About-CMS/Components/CPI/Downloads/Center-for-Program-Integrity-Future-of-PI-RFI.pdf
###
Get CMS news at cms.gov/newsroom, sign up for CMS news via email and follow CMS on Twitter CMS
Administrator @SeemaCMS, @CMSgov, and @CMSgovPress.
|
|
|
To be a Medicare Agent's source of information on topics affecting the agent and their business, and most importantly, their clientele, is the intention of this site. Sourced from various means rooted in the health insurance industry - insurance carriers, governmental agencies, and industry news agencies, this is aimed as a resource of varying viewpoints to spark critical thought and discussion. We welcome your contributions.
Wednesday, October 23, 2019
The Future of Medicare Program Integrity
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


No comments:
Post a Comment