Jessica Kim Cohen December
17, 2019
The CMS may have doled out $93.6 million in
erroneous Medicare incentive payments to acute-care hospitals using electronic
health record systems, according to new estimates from HHS' Office of Inspector
General.
The CMS plans to attempt to recover some, but
not all, of the possible erroneous payments, according to the OIG's report.
The estimated $93.6 million represents less than
1% of the total $10.8 billion Medicare EHR incentive payments the CMS paid to
acute-care hospitals during a nearly five-year audit period, from January 2013
to September 2017. Payments dispensed as part of the incentive program, which
was renamed the Medicare
Promoting Interoperability Program last year, are meant to encourage hospitals
to use EHRs.
"CMS appreciates OIG's estimate that over
99 percent of the $10.8 billion in total incentive payments in this legacy
program were correct," CMS Administrator Seema Verma wrote in an October
letter to acting Inspector General Joanne Chiedi.
The CMS did not respond to a request for comment
on the OIG's findings at deadline.
For its audit, the OIG reviewed 99 of the 8,297
payments. The 99 payments, 53 of which were final and 46 of which were not
final, totaled $152.2 million.
Fifty of the 99 payments included in the audit
were made erroneously and not in accordance with federal requirements, the OIG
found. They totaled $1.3 million, less than 1% of the $152.2 million figure. Of
those 50, more than half—63%—were from final payments.
"On the basis of our sample results, we
estimated that CMS made incorrect net incentive payments of $93.6
million," the OIG wrote.
The OIG attributed the errors to Medicare
administrative contractors not properly reviewing information from hospitals'
cost reports, which are used to calculate incentive payments. Some cost reports
included errors like hospitals using data for more than 12 months and
incorporating services other than acute-care services.
The CMS also neglected to include some required
services in its incentive payment calculations, such as labor and delivery
services, as well as some services related to intensive-care units.
To attempt to recover the estimated $93.6
million, the OIG recommended the CMS instruct Medicare administrative
contractors to review all hospitals' supporting documentation to identify the
above errors. The OIG also recommended the CMS attempt to recover the 50
erroneous payments already identified in the office's audit. The CMS said it
would review the list and work to recoup incorrect final payments and ask
Medicare administrative contractors to make corrections on the cost reports of
non-final payments.
But for the remaining erroneous payments from
the period not identified in the audit, the CMS said it would only implement
the OIG's recommendations to "the extent that it applies to non-final
payments."
The OIG seemed to question that approach.
"Limiting (Medicare administrative contractor) reviews of supporting
documentation to only non-final payments and revising the incentive payment
calculations to include labor and delivery days only for non-final payments
could result in a large portion of overpayments not being recouped," the
OIG wrote.
It could put a strain on health systems to have
incentive payments they were expecting—or have already received—changed, said
Michael Abrams, managing partner of Numerof & Associates.
"But I'm not sure that the fact it might be
a hardship would be a reason for anyone to say I should get to keep it,"
he said.
Health systems "often run on pretty thin
margins, and manage cash flow in a pretty proactive and thoughtful way,"
said Rick Kes, healthcare senior analyst at audit and consulting firm RSM.
Those thin margins make health systems particularly sensitive to unexpected
changes in their cash flow, and a reduction might cut into funds available for
more long-term projects like innovation and expansion efforts.
The impact would also depend on the magnitude of
the incorrect payment. If just a portion of a health system's incentive payment
over the five-year period is revoked, "maybe it won't be a super
significant issue for them to overcome," Kes added.
No comments:
Post a Comment