What will it take to kill
this bull market? That's the headline of my colleague Randall
Forsyth's column this
weekend. Randy notes that for all the tragedy and terrible headlines this year,
investors who sat back and didn't complicate their investments did quite
well.
The
stock market would have amply rewarded those who closed their eyes and rode out
the year in the large-capitalization indexes. For that, they would have been
rewarded with a 25.52% total return in the SPDR S&P
500 exchange-traded fund (ticker: SPY) from the beginning of 2021 through
Wednesday, according to Morningstar. (We’ll look at ETF returns since that’s
how most folks are playing along at home.)
Going outside of the
large-capitalization benchmark mostly wasn’t worth the trouble or risk.
Small-caps trailed with less than half their big brethren’s return, with a
12.34% year-to-date return on the iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM).
Venturing abroad didn’t pay either, with the Vanguard FTSE All-World
ex-US ETF (VEU) returning just 6.32%. Credit (or blame) less-developed
markets; the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) suffered a
negative 4.87% return, and the iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) took a
22.02% hit.
Randy is far less optimistic
about the coming year, noting that the end of easy money policies from central
bankers will cause plenty of pain, even if we all know it's coming.
It’s an
axiom of finance that a low cost of money pumps up the value of assets. The
present value of an investment’s future cash flows goes up as the interest rate
to finance that investment goes down. Cheap, abundant capital can justify all
manner of wild and wonderful investments, from electric vehicles to stationary
bicycles with tablet computers attached to cryptocurrencies of no intrinsic
value that can fluctuate 20% over a weekend.
Besides
the seemingly never-ending effects of the pandemic, the signal aspect of 2021’s
financial markets has been the power of money, conjured and created by central
banks. It has accommodated borrowing by governments on a scale never
experienced in peacetime and pumped up asset values to records. And it’s having
the same effect on the prices of what’s being purchased, which has put
inflation at the top of the worry list of the public and politicians.
Next year, some of that
process will begin to reverse. Printing less money may slow the process of
pumping up prices, but the impact is apt to be uneven. It may well affect
prices of securities first, then prices of goods and services. And the way down
is likely to be less pleasant than the way up.
You can read the rest of Randy's column here.
No comments:
Post a Comment