If I had to take a wild guess, I would
assume you’ve seen the emails from Elon Musk stating that employee must work a
minimum of 40 hours a week, not remote.
“Everyone at
Tesla is required to spend a minimum of 40 hours in the office per week.
Moreover, the office must be where your actual colleagues are located, not some
remote pseudo office. If you don’t show up, we will assume you have resigned.”
On the other hand, I was reading research
from McKinsey that stated that mental health support is sorely lacking - but vitally
important.
“Employees
need, and increasingly demand, resources to help them cope with mental health
problems. If companies make mental health services more accessible and
intervene in the workplace in ways that improve well-being, they will simultaneously
make investments that will provide real improvements in employee outcomes and
consequently in company performance.”
So, what does one have to do with the
other?
When I worked for a company that demanded
everyone be in-person and work a minimum of 40 hours a week I was stressed out.
I was anxious. I was depressed. I spent almost two hours sitting in traffic to
get to the office. Then another six-to-seven hours a day in meetings, leaving
one hour to get any actual work done. This often meant that I would stay at the
office an extra few hours to catch up, and then spent two hours driving home.
Quick math - that makes a 15-16 hour day. That left me zero time for anything
else. By the time the weekend rolled around I was too exhausted to do much of
anything, let alone address my mental health. To that point, there aren’t a lot
of medical and mental health practices available on the weekends if it’s not an
emergency.
Long story short, my commute was
contributing to the depression and anxiety I was feeling from a toxic
workplace. And it was the hours I was being forced to keep that did not allow
me to address my mental health.
There is no shortage of research around work/life
balance, mental health, and remote work benefits. It all points to we
(people) are anxious, tired, and burnt out. Demanding even more of us is not
going to get good results.
I was talking with a client the other day
and they are having a lot of staff turnover in rapid succession. They are
struggling to backfill the open positions so the remaining team members are
being asked to take on more and more responsibility. And then those team
members leave, perpetuating the issue.
Back to Elon. You can (and I have) argued
both sides of his commentary. Remove Elon from the equation and think about any
employer you’ve worked for. People should be doing the work they are paid to
do. Not everyone is productive when they are remote. I get it. There are always
going to be exceptions that make a rule hard to enforce. On the other hand,
when I think about my previous life and my sixteen hour days (which didn’t include
cooking, cleaning, having a personal life, and appointments) I bristle when
thinking about those employer demands.
In the case of Elon, he’s totally in the
wrong. His actions don’t match his words. He is taking a 23 billion dollar
bonus. He’s incredibly out of touch. So take his demands with a grain of salt.
So what do we, the employees, do?
As an employer, you can ask whatever you
want of your employees. However, you have to deal the the consequences if it
doesn’t align with what your employees can give. As an employee, you can choose
to not work for someone that doesn’t support what you need. However, and this
is a hard pill to swallow, you may not ever find your perfect position so you
may need to re-evaluate what is critically important and what is nice to have.
What’s your take? Let
me know in our Free Slack Group Analytics for Marketers.
- Katie
Robbert, CEO
No comments:
Post a Comment