Aug. 14, 2018
Dive
Brief:
- A
new Kaiser Family Foundation
report found that almost one in five inpatient admissions
in large employer health plans includes a claim from an out-of-network
provider.
- Even when
patients use in-network facilities, they often face claims from
out-of-network providers. That's true especially for emergency room
claims, according to the report.
- Members who receive outpatient
mental health services are significantly more likely to have a claim from
an out-of-network provider, KFF said.
Dive
Insight:
Surprise
billing, also called balance billing, is an issue that continues to confront
patients despite federal and state regulations. Even patients who make sure the
facility is in-network can get whacked with out-of-network charges based on who
cares for them at the facility.
Surprise
billing can leave patients with medical bills beyond their means. A 2016 KFF survey reported
that nearly 70% of people who couldn't afford out-of-network bills said they
didn't know the provider was out of network when they received care.
The
study authors analyzed 2016 claims for nearly 20 million people. The claims
represented almost one-quarter of the 85 million people in the large group
market.
The
review found that 27% of admissions with an emergency room claim includes an
out-of-network charge. Only 15% of in-patient visits that didn't include an ER
visit wound up with out-of-network claims.
"Patients
in emergency situations have limited ability to control the care they receive
and from whom they receive it. Even when the facility is in-network, the
professional services may not be and the patient often is not in a position to
direct their care," according to the report.
The
study also found that one-third of in-patient psychological or substance abuse
claims includes an out-of-network charge. That percentage compares with
surgical (20%), medical (19%) and children and newborn (11%).
The
report suggested the reason for more out-of-network claims for psychological
and or substance abuse is because of fewer in-network facilities or
professional for those services.
KFF
added that members with anesthesia and pathology claims are more likely to have
an out-of-network claim regardless as to whether they get services from an
in-network facility. "In many instances, it is doubtful that
enrollees could reasonably anticipate or control their use of out-of-network
providers," the report said.
KFF's
report findings mirror a Health Affair study that
found one-fifth of all hospital inpatient admissions that originated in
the ER, 14% of outpatient ER visits and 9% of scheduled inpatient admissions
led to surprise medical bills.
Though
federal law requires health plans to apply in-network cost sharing when members
use out-of-network providers in emergency services and some states have
strengthened laws against surprise billing, many people still get hit with
out-of-network charges directly from providers.
In
fact, an Altarum report in
November awarded only Maine and New Hampshire an A on healthcare price
transparency. Maryland and Oregon got a B while Colorado and Virginia received
a C. Every other state failed.
But
some patients are fighting back against
surprise billing.
"A
lot of consumers don't understand how insurance works, and particularly these
days with high-deductible health plans becoming more and more common, a lot of
people are getting bills they don't understand," Akshay Gupta,
co-founder and executive partner of CoPatient, a company that helps consumers
understand and resolve their medical bills, recently toldHealthcare Dive.
"People that come to us are often quite distraught."
https://www.healthcaredive.com/news/nearly-20-of-inpatient-admissions-include-out-of-network-charge/529977/
No comments:
Post a Comment