CMS NEWS
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
November 8, 2018
CMS Proposes Changes to Streamline and Strengthen Medicaid and
CHIP Managed Care Regulations
Proposed Rule Continues Commitment to Promote Flexibility,
Strengthen Accountability, and Maintain and Enhance Program Integrity in
Medicaid and CHIP
Today, the Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is proposing significant regulatory
revisions to streamline the 2016 managed care regulatory framework. The
changes reflect a broader strategy to relieve regulatory burdens; support
state flexibility and local leadership; and promote transparency,
flexibility, and innovation in care delivery. While the 2016 managed care
final rule was a substantial and comprehensive rewrite of the Medicaid and
Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) regulatory structure, it
included provisions that many states and stakeholders identified as
unnecessarily prescriptive and as adding unnecessary costs and
administrative burden to state Medicaid programs without contributing to
the improvement of health outcomes.
As part of CMS’ broader
efforts to reduce administrative burden, CMS formed a working group with
the National Association of Medicaid Directors (NAMD) and state Medicaid
Directors to create a framework to review and prioritize areas of concern
within the managed care regulations. Together the working group reviewed
and analyzed the regulation to identify opportunities to achieve a better
balance between appropriate federal oversight and state flexibility, while
also maintaining critical beneficiary protections, ensuring fiscal
integrity, and promoting accountability for providing quality of care for
Medicaid beneficiaries.
“Today’s action fulfills
one of my earliest commitments to reset and restore the
federal-state relationship, while at the same time modernizing the program
to deliver better outcomes for the people we serve,” said
CMS Administrator Seema Verma. “I want to thank the state workgroup and the
CMS team for their diligent work in analyzing these complex regulations and
coming forward with a common sense approach to right-size our regulatory
oversight and let states focus more on delivering quality health care to
their beneficiaries.”
Managed care is a system
where states contract with private health plans to administer Medicaid
benefits. Over two thirds (68.1 percent) of all Medicaid beneficiaries were
enrolled in comprehensive managed care in 2016, up from 65.5 percent in
2015. As states continue to expand their use of comprehensive managed care
to deliver Medicaid services, enrollment in comprehensive managed care
reached 54.6 million beneficiaries in 2016. The more states continue moving
new populations into managed care that have traditionally received their
benefits through Medicaid fee-for-service.
To reduce state
administrative burden and enhance the ability of states to effectively
manage s their Medicaid and CHIP programs, these key proposed revisions to
the 2016 final rule would include:
- Promoting
Flexibility
- Providing
states with greater flexibility to develop and certify a rate range
under specific conditions and limitations, including that the rate
range be actuarially sound;
- Removing
barriers that made it difficult to transition new services and
populations into managed care because of existing fee-for-service
payment arrangements by providing states with a three year transition
period to come into compliance with requirements related to
pass-through payments;
- Providing
states more flexibility to set meaningful network adequacy standards
using quantitative standards that can take into account new service
delivery models like telehealth;
- Removing
outdated and overly prescriptive administrative requirements that
govern how plans communicate with beneficiaries to better align with
standards used across federal programs and enable the use of modern
means of electronic communication when appropriate.
- Strengthening
Accountability
- Requiring
CMS to hold ourselves accountable to issue guidance to help states
move more quickly through the federal rate review process and to
allow for submission of less documentation in certain circumstances
while providing appropriate oversight to ensure patient protections
and fiscal integrity;
- Maintaining
the requirement for states to develop a Quality Rating System (QRS)
for health plans to facilitate beneficiary choice and promote
transparency, but with greater ability for states to tailor an
alternative QRS to their unique program while requiring a minimum set
of mandatory measures to align with the Medicaid and CHIP Scorecard.
- Maintaining
and Enhancing Program Integrity
- Maintaining
the current regulatory framework for program and fiscal integrity,
including provisions related to the actuarial soundness of rate
setting, provider screening and enrollment standards, and medical
loss ratio (MLR) standards;
- Strengthening
federal requirements to protect federal taxpayers from cost shifting
by prohibiting states from retroactively adding or modifying risk-sharing
mechanisms and ensuring that differences in reimbursement rates are
not linked to enhanced federal match.
Additionally, states
expressed their concerns with how the 2016 final rule’s limitation of 15
days on lengths of stay for managed care beneficiaries in an institution
for mental disease (IMD) created difficult administrative challenges for
states. CMS is not proposing any changes to this requirement at this time;
however, it is asking for comment from states for data that could support
revisions to this policy. Meanwhile, CMS continues to support state
flexibility through section 1115 demonstrations, having approved a total of
15 waivers of the IMD exclusion for states to treat patients with substance
use disorder (SUD), to expand access to treatment, and is exploring further
options remove barriers to important treatment options.
"Targeted
improvements to the managed care rule have been a top priority for Medicaid
Directors,” said Board President of NAMD, Judy Mohr Peterson. “NAMD
appreciates the partnership shown by CMS to explore these issues and
dialogue with the states, providing an opportunity to share perspectives on
how the managed care regulatory framework could be improved. We look
forward to reviewing CMS's proposed revisions and submitting formal
comments."
###
|
No comments:
Post a Comment