CMS announced that a
UnitedHealthcare contract will be suspended for a year for failing to reach the
mandatory 85 percent medical loss ratio.
October 15, 2019
- In a letter released on September 11, CMS
informed UnitedHealthcare that its Medicare contract H5322 through Care
Improvement Plus failed to meet its medical loss ratio requirement for the
third year in a row and, as a result, would be suspended for the year.
“As a result of this
determination, Care Improvement Plus will be prohibited from accepting any
MA-PD plan enrollments which would be effective January 1, 2020, through
December 1, 2020,” CMS announced.
Each year, a plan
must achieve a certain medical loss ratio (MLR), meaning a certain amount of
every premium dollar must go to consumers’ medical claims or health
improvement. If payers overreach this threshold, putting more premium dollars
toward administration and health plan upkeep, the payers must pay it back to
their consumers in the form of a rebate.
As a Medicare
contract on the large group health insurance market, UHC is required to reach
an 85 percent MLR for Care Improvement Plus’s H5322 contract, such that $0.85
out of every premium dollar goes toward beneficiaries’ health needs.
Care Improvement Plus
has gradually been ramping up the plan’s MLR to meet that threshold but missed
the mark. In the past three years, UHC paid 71.3 percent for calendar year (CY)
2016, 83.9 percent for CY 2017, and 84.1 percent for CY 2018.
Meeting the medical
loss ratio stipulation has been a challenge for payers for years. In the
past, fraud prevention and recovery have prevented payers from reaching their
required MLRs.
For UHC, the payer
says, the inhibitor was the corporate tax rate.
“In mid-2019 a change
in the corporate tax rate went into effect, which adversely impacted MLR for
H5322 plans,” the payer explained in a written statement to HealthPayerIntelligence.com.
“We subsequently
factored that change into our MLR calculations and anticipate achieving an MLR
above 85 percent in 2019, which will allow us to enroll new members for 2021.
We anticipate that we will achieve the MLR threshold in 2019 for H5322, which
will allow us to resume enrollment in these plans in 2021.”
The payer noted that
there are alternative UHC plans in the affected areas and promised an increase
in benefits and coverage for existing members, which includes 40,000 dually
eligible members.
While Care
Improvement Plus may not accept new enrollees after December 1, 2019, those who
already have a Care Improvement Plus plan will still receive coverage. For
employers, Care Improvement Plus may submit a waiver to enroll more individuals
to their existing group health insurance plans but they may not bring on new
groups for employer sponsored insurance.
If the plan fails to
meet the 85 percent MLR requirement for five consecutive years, the contract
must be terminated.
UHC is not alone in
facing a reprimand from CMS, however it is the only plan that failed to meet
the MLR so far this year. CMS has placed 13 sanctions this year, including the
one on Care Improvement Plus South Central Insurance Company, as well as one
termination.
MLRs were instituted
to protect consumers’ interests and ensure that they are receiving benefits for
their premium dollars. It has been discussed as a potential method of holding
dental insurers accountable to investing appropriately in consumer care as
well. For example, when California realized in 2018 that only $0.76 of every
premium dollar goes towards a consumer’s health under the average California
dental plan, the state instituted an MLR for the dental industry.
While MLRs set up
protections for consumers and incentives for payers to increase benefits, MLRs
are also driving payers’ rebates to historic
levels, particularly in individual health insurance market. On the
individual health insurance market alone, payers will be paying back $1.3
billion to members this year, the highest amount since the Affordable Care Act
took effect.
While UHC’s plan is
suspended for a year, the payer will invest more premium dollars into members’ benefits,
over and above its 2018 increases. UHC’s scenario draws attention to the
potential challenges payers face in maintaining an MLR and the goals of such an
approach.
No comments:
Post a Comment