by Leslie Small
After the New York Times published an investigation into newly public negotiated rates between
hospitals and insurers — and concluded that insurers have "little
incentive" to negotiate lower costs — top industry trade group AHIP hit
back with a blog post claiming that the article "spotlights a
lot of numbers with little context, no clarity for patients, and no insight
that helps anyone shop for care."
Background:
- For its investigation, the Times teamed up with two
University of Maryland-Baltimore County researchers to comb through
negotiated rates published by hospitals under a Trump-era price
transparency rule.
- One of the investigation's most interesting findings is
that "in many cases, insured patients are getting prices that are
higher than they would if they pretended to have no coverage at all."
- The article also asserts that insurers "may not
have a strong motivation" to walk away from a bad deal with a health
care provider, "given that the more that is spent on care, the more
an insurance company can earn."
What industry observers say:
- "Rarely do insurers behave abnormally,"
weighs in Ge Bai, Ph.D., an associate professor at Johns Hopkins
University's Carey Business School and Bloomberg School of Public Health.
"Most of their decisions are strategic to maximize profit. When
insured patients get worse prices for hospital services [than cash-paying
patients], it indicates that the insurance companies may have more to lose
when the contracted hospital price is lower than when it is higher."
- But Loren Adler, associate director of the
USC-Brookings Schaeffer Initiative for Health Policy, takes issue with the
article's implication that medical loss ratio (MLR) requirements create a
scenario in which insurers make more money if providers get paid. That
misses the point that "very few insurers are actually up against the
MLR requirement," he says, which "strongly implies that they do
have incentives to reduce costs. They're still in competition with each
other."
- Some experts say there's equal blame to be cast on
payers and providers for escalating health care prices. "The higher
the prices, the higher the premiums; the higher the premiums, the higher
the profits," says says Joe Paduda, principal of Health Strategy
Associates LLC. "What a great country."
No comments:
Post a Comment