As the Biden administration continues to dash states' dreams of
implementing Medicaid work requirements, CMS this month took a critical step in
revisiting Tennessee's plans to use a fixed funding mechanism. With the opening
of a new 30-day federal public comment period regarding the approval of
TennCare III, experts anticipate a great amount of negative input that will
lead the program to a fate similar to that of work requirements.
Background:
- The Trump administration on Jan. 8 approved Tennessee's request to use an
"aggregate cap" approach to Medicaid funding that many industry
observers have likened to a block grant. Through the unprecedented
approach, Tennessee will receive federal Medicaid funds based on a fixed
budget target that is determined by CMS and the state using historical
enrollment and cost data. If the state spends less than its target cap
while meeting yet-to-be determined quality goals, it can earn up to 55% of
annual savings to reinvest back into other state health programs.
Demo faces pushback:
- The approval was met with strong opposition from
beneficiary advocates, including 13 Medicaid beneficiaries who filed a
complaint challenging the agency’s approval of the 10-year demonstration.
What industry experts say:
- "What concerns me is if you follow the money,
there's shared savings, depending on quality measures which have yet to be
named, and so where the expenses [are highest is] in the disability
category and in the duals. So that's where the money is and there's a
strong incentive to save money with this program," asserts Jerry
Vitti, founder and CEO of Healthcare Financial, Inc. "While the
modified version is innovative, you still have this overriding financial
model that could have negative implications" for high-cost populations.
- Vitti says he expects CMS will hear from multiple
advocacy organizations, and their comments could inform any modifications
requested by the Biden administration, although that's "the mildest
case scenario."
- "Block grants, even Tennessee's modified aggregate
cap plan, will drive a greater divide in health equity —
socio-economically and racially," argues Gary Rosenfield, senior vice
president at ConsejoSano. "Block grants may promote efficiencies in
some areas, but in reality the upshot is that it will narrow already
sparse networks even further, creating less access to care, minimal
benefits, and ultimately worse outcomes."
No comments:
Post a Comment