By Sarah Jane
Tribble AUGUST 10, 2018
Three
months after President Donald Trump announced his blueprint to bring down drug
prices, administration officials have begun putting some teeth behind the
rhetoric.
Many
details have yet to be announced. But experts who pay close attention to
federal drug policy and Medicare rules say the administration is preparing to
incrementally roll out a multipronged plan that tasks the Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Food and Drug Administration with
promoting competition, attacking the complicated drug rebate system and
introducing tactics to lower what the government pays for drugs.
Mark
McClellan, director of the Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy in Durham,
N.C., and a former CMS administrator, said that although none of the initial steps
has “fundamentally transformed drug prices,” there is “a lot going on inside
the administration.”
Two HHS
officials who are rolling out the plan, Dan Best and John O’Brien, described
their efforts to Kaiser Health News not as a public relations strategy but a
push to reform the system.
“This
administration is trying to go after root causes” of high drug prices, said
Wells Fargo analyst David Maris.
But
others are not so optimistic.
Ameet
Sarpatwari, an instructor in medicine at Harvard Medical School in Boston, said
policies the administration has rolled out thus far “alone will not translate
into meaningful cost savings for most Americans.”
Broadly,
the strategy falls under a handful of steps:
1.
Attacking The Rebates
Health
and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar has said Americans “do
not have a real market for prescription drugs” because drug middlemen and
insurers get a wide range of hidden rebates from drugmakers, but those savings
may not be passed on to consumers or Medicare. In July, the administration
submitted a proposed rule that could change the way rebates are handled.
Details
of the proposal have not been made public. But O’Brien, a deputy assistant
secretary at HHS, explained during a recent conference on federal drug spending
sponsored by the Pew Charitable Trust: “You don’t have to use market power to
get rebates, you can use market power to obtain discounts, to actually lower
the price of the drug on the front end.”
Umer
Raffat, an investment analyst with EverCore ISI, said “it’s not clear [that
drug prices are going down]” but the “rebate structure is changing.”
2.
Bringing More Negotiation To Medicare
This
week, CMS Administrator Seema Verma announced that Medicare Advantage insurers
can use a step-therapy approach to negotiate better prices for Part B drugs —
those administered in hospitals and doctors’ offices. These private plans will
be allowed to require patients to first select the least expensive drug before
stepping up to more costly drugs if the original medications aren’t working.
The
administration is also looking at ways to introduce more competition into Part
B drug purchasing. That idea was mentioned deep inside the annual Medicare outpatient payment
rule released last month.
Peter
Bach, director of Memorial Sloan Kettering’s Center for Health Policy and
Outcomes in New York, pointed to the possible introduction of a competitive
purchasing program in which a firm negotiates with drugmakers to buy their
drugs and then sells them to the doctors and hospitals that will administer the
medications. Bach said that helps ensure that hospitals and doctors can’t make
more money by prescribing more expensive drugs.
Currently,
Medicare pays the average sales price plus 6 percent to doctors or hospitals
when they purchase drugs, a pricing mechanism that can benefit the providers if
the drug costs go up. If there were a third party buying the drugs, it would
“have a huge effect,” Bach said.
3.
Paying For Value
Trump’s
blueprint calls for CMS to encourage “value-based care” to lower drug prices,
shifting from paying a set fee for drugs to basing payments on how well the
patient does on them.
Louisiana’s
Medicaid program could show the way. The state is working with CMS to explore
a subscription-based model to
pay for hepatitis C medicines. Louisiana would pay a fixed price to a drug
manufacturer that would then get unlimited access to treat patients enrolled in
Louisiana’s Medicaid program or in prison.
The
program would move “from a big payment upfront to paying less over time based
on actual outcomes,” said McClellan, who also serves on the boards of health
care giant Johnson & Johnson and insurer Cigna.
CMS
also approved a Medicaid waiver from
Oklahoma in June. Medicaid programs are allowed to negotiate drug prices.
Oklahoma’s plan would expand that to negotiate additional prescription price
reductions based on value-based purchasing agreements.
Still,
CMS’ recent rejection of a related Massachusetts proposal makes it difficult to
believe negotiating drug prices will really happen, said Sara Rosenbaum, a
professor of health law and policy at George Washington University.
That
proposal would have allowed Massachusetts’ Medicaid program to choose drugs
based on cost and how well the medicines work.
“They
have been very good and quite careful with their [Medicaid] program and so why
not let them try this?” Rosenbaum said.
4.
Tackling Foreign Drug Costs
Pharmaceutical
makers often sell their drugs at substantially lower prices in many foreign
countries than they do in the United States. Trump emphasizedin May that
“it’s time to end the global freeloading once and for all,” saying U.S.
consumers were paying part of the cost of the medicines that patients in other
countries use.
He
directed U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer to address the situation.
Lighthizer’s office declined to comment.
When
Sen. Todd Young (R-Ind.) asked during a Senate health committee hearing in
June whether trade agreements with other countries should be
used to “level the playing field,” Azar’s response was swift: “We absolutely
believe we should be using our trade agreements to get them to pay more even as
we have our job to pay less.”
Avalere
Health President Matt Brow, who has been involved in talks with the
administration, said it’s clear the focus on overseas pricing isn’t going away
and the administration is “talking a lot about how to get the president what he
wants.”
5.
Increasing Competition
FDA
Commissioner Scott Gottlieb has become the Trump administration’s lead
proponent for increasing competition among drugmakers.
Competition
resonates with Americans “because people see it every day in their experience
in Costco and other places,” said Rena Conti, an assistant professor at the
University of Chicago.
Gottlieb
has announced plans to bolster the use of generic drugs and an “action plan” to
encourage the development of biosimilars, which are copycat versions of
expensive biologic drugs made from living organisms.
And to
combat anti-competitive behavior in the market, Gottlieb said the FDA has
passed along information to the Federal Trade Commission and hinted at
potential action to come: “I think we’ve handed them some pretty good facts.”
KHN’s coverage of
prescription drug development, costs and pricing is supported in part by
the Laura and John Arnold Foundation.
Sarah
Jane Tribble: sjtribble@kff.org,
@SJTribble
https://khn.org/news/with-5-point-plan-trump-administration-sinks-teeth-into-paring-down-drug-prices/?utm_campaign=KFF-2018-The-Latest&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=65123562&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-9yztTjsJLd3gnLRfIgAPSjG5iYGmstpqAl0heOr9ST9lQoB4ATVRszbZLCw461HrOoSQ8i64zjm3HNQb301XSn-jJerQ&_hsmi=65123562
No comments:
Post a Comment