By Rachel Bluth APRIL 9,
2019
It was back-to-school day at the Senate Finance Committee
hearing Tuesday morning. In the third of a series of hearings on rising drug
prices, the senators seemed focused on getting an answer to one central
question: What the heck is a pharmacy benefit manager?
Pharmacy benefit managers,
or PBMs, are the go-between companies that negotiate with drugmakers on which
medicines will make insurance plans’ lists of covered drugs and how much
insurers’ plans will pay for them. This amount often involves rebates paid by
the drugmaker to the PBM, and those savings are generally not passed on to the
customer at the pharmacy counter. But when a consumer uses his or her health
coverage to fill a prescription, PBMs are involved in paying the claim and
setting the amount the consumers owes.
PBMs and drug manufacturers are prominent players in the drug-pricing pipeline and
each group has been trying to blame the other for soaring prices. PBMs
increasingly seem to be in the hot seat — specifically targeted
in a public relations campaign by
the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, the powerful and
influential trade association of the drug industry.
The hearing attracted so many people that some spectators were
turned away. Well over a dozen reporters were on hand to cover the proceedings.
Representatives from Cigna, CVS Caremark, UnitedHealthcare’s
OptumRx, Humana and Prime Therapeutics, all PBMs, testified on the ins and outs
of their little-understood industry, disputing the idea that they are simply
“middlemen” taking their cut, but rather pharmacy experts looking for the most
effective and cheapest drugs for their clients.
Though they’ve been around for decades, the new attention on
PBMs had senators playing catch-up, trying to sort out and demystify exactly what
they are and what they do.
“Despite this vast influence over what often amounts to life and
death, many consumers have very little insight into the workings of PBMs,” Sen.
Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), chairman of the Finance Committee, said in his opening
statement.
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), the panel’s ranking member, called PBM
negotiations “the most gnarled, confounding riddles,” before giving the packed
committee room a lesson in “PBM 101.”
“What PBMs do to earn all those profits is a mystery,” Wyden
said.
Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) used his time to ask a series of five
yes-or-no questions to the all-male panel.
“I’m trying to understand the basic features of the contracts
between manufacturers and PBMs,” he said. “I need to establish basic facts
about how it works.”
Senators pressed the witnesses for answers about their
relationships to manufacturers. Did PBMs ever persuade drug companies to set a
higher list price so the PBM could have more flexibility to negotiate a rebate?
They all answered no.
Some lines of questioning were less fruitful than others.
“Are there any other egregious anti-consumer practices in your
industry you’d like to highlight?” Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) asked.
The complete silence suggested there were not.
Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) brought up the Trump
administration’s proposalto eliminate
drug rebates as a means of negotiation. He also used his question as an
opportunity to call attention to Health and Human Services Secretary Alex
Azar’s past job as an Eli Lilly executive and to hint at how drug companies
also were part of the problem.
“So to recap, PBMs do not set drug prices,” Brown said. “The
administration rule will not change that fact.” Then Brown got to the point
that numerous surveys have shown is a primary health care concern among
Americans: high drug prices. “Most importantly, absolutely nothing in the
proposed rule would require Secretary Azar’s former employer or any other
pharma company to lower their price for insulin or any other drug,” he said.
“We should be focused on solutions that would lead to lower drug
prices, like my legislation to allow Medicare to negotiate on
behalf of all Part D drugs and to prohibit price gouging,”
Brown added.
The witnesses said the key to lowering drug prices was not
increased public transparency around the process or having the government
negotiate drug prices. Instead, they advocated more competition in the drug
market, something that would affect their favorite foe — drug manufacturers —
the most.
“It sure looks to me like you all are taking deliberate actions
to pad your bottom line at the expense of patients,” Grassley said.
Rachel Bluth: rbluth@kff.org, @RachelHBluth
https://khn.org/news/senate-hearing-drug-pricing-lesson-on-pharmacy-benefit-managers/?utm_campaign=KFF-2019-The-Latest&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=71639440&_hsenc=p2ANqtz--nOOXOVy1z9xArn8D85UME-QV2UqtvHE0YfwamY1O7sMoypjC826QZAK5R-QAcM8A6TkAa_L9vIPzlPIOql__CV6V0og&_hsmi=71639440
No comments:
Post a Comment