OCTOBER 17, 2019
Despite
the turmoil from the ongoing impeachment inquiry, Democrats in the U.S. House
of Representatives are proceeding with work on a major prescription drug price
bill crafted by Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
Meanwhile,
broader health issues continue to be a point of contention among the Democratic
presidential candidates.
And
courts around the country are dealing setbacks to many of the Trump
administration’s health agenda items, including one that would make it harder
for immigrants to get green cards if they use public programs.
This
week’s panelists are Julie Rovner of Kaiser Health News, Joanne Kenen of
Politico, Tami Luhby of CNN and Margot Sanger-Katz of The New York Times.
Among
the takeaways from this week’s podcast:
·
Getting an ambitious drug pricing package through Congress by
the end of the year seems unlikely, not only because of impeachment, but also
because the Senate is not on board with Pelosi’s plan.
·
Still, a Congressional Budget Office analysis
released this week found the Pelosi bill would save Medicare $345 billion over
10 years, giving Democrats a major talking point. On the other hand, the CBO
also suggested the measure could reduce the number of new drugs that come to
market by eight to 15 in the coming decade, providing a talking point for
opponents.
·
Also of interest, the House Energy and Commerce Committee is
planning to consider adding some benefits — including dental, vision and
hearing — to traditional Medicare. It’s not clear if this is a response to the
campaign season, or the idea that before pursuing “Medicare for All” there are
changes to the traditional Medicare program that could be made.
·
Health care again was a hot topic in this week’s Democratic
presidential primary debate, and Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, now
viewed as the front-runner, was in the hot seat. Warren again evaded the
question of who would pay for her preferred Medicare for All plan and was
criticized by candidates like Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota and Mayor Pete
Buttigieg of South Bend, Ind., both of whom support more incremental changes to
the health system.
·
Meanwhile, the courts continue to play a key role in health
policy. Federal judges in several states blocked the administration’s “public
charge” rule that would make it harder for legal immigrants to obtain green
cards if they or their family members use any of a long list of public
programs. Federal judges also heard arguments on Medicaid work requirements.
Meanwhile, a panel of judges in Ohio blocked a state abortion ban, while a
federal judge in Texas blocked an Obama-era rule intended to enforce
anti-discrimination provisions of the Affordable Care Act.
Plus,
for extra credit, the panelists recommend their favorite health policy stories
of the week they think you should read, too:
Julie
Rovner: KHN’s “We Vape, We Vote’: How Vaping Crackdowns Are Politicizing
Vapers, by Rachel Bluth and Lauren Weber
Joanne
Kenen: The Los Angeles Times’ “In the rush to harvest body parts, death investigations
have been upended,” by Melody Petersen
Tami
Luhby: ProPublica’s “It’s Very Unethical”: Audio Shows Hospital Kept
Vegetative Patient on Life Support to Boost Survival Rates,” by
Caroline Chen
Margot
Sanger-Katz: “Tradeoffs,”
a podcast hosted by Dan Gorenstein, Sayeh Nikpay and Anupam Jena
No comments:
Post a Comment