by Jane Anderson
California's individual health exchange successfully used
inexpensive email and letters to encourage consumers to switch to lower-cost
coverage that provided them with better benefits, according to new research.
The 2019 program from Covered California potentially could be duplicated in
other states to help consumers save on coverage, according to the study, which
was published in Health Affairs.
During the 2019 open enrollment period for California's
Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplace, Covered California used a randomized
intervention to see if low-income beneficiaries, particularly those who earn
less than 200% of the federal poverty level, could be encouraged to enroll in
silver plans with cost-sharing reduction (CSR) subsidies, which made more sense
for them.
Consumers in this bracket are eligible for CSR, plans with lower
premiums and out-of-pocket expenses, which increase the actuarial value of the
base silver plan from 70% to as high as 94%, depending on income.
However, the Covered California marketplace does not
automatically assign CSR-eligible consumers into enhanced silver tier plans,
and an analysis conducted by the exchange found that nearly 20,000 consumers
had chosen more costly gold and silver plans for the 2019 coverage year, even
though they were eligible for an enhanced silver-level plan.
The study randomly assigned households to one of three groups: a
control group that received no CSR-silver-specific messaging, an email-only
group and a mail-plus-email group.
At the end of the study period, 17.7% of the control group had
switched to enhanced silver plans. Relative to the control group, being
assigned to the email-only group increased the enhanced silver enrollment rate
by 2.0 percentage points for an 11% increase in plan switching relative to the
control group. Being part of the mail-plus-email group increased the enhanced
silver enrollment rate by 3.9 percentage points for a 22% increase in plan
switching relative to the control group.
The results could be duplicated in other states, the researchers
concluded. "Given that gold enrollment increased not just in California
but nationwide after the termination of CSR subsidies, other states are likely
grappling with how to guide low-income consumers to the best available plan for
which they are eligible. Our intervention points to a low-cost approach for
states that could yield reductions in choice errors."
No comments:
Post a Comment