Christopher Holt April 21, 2020
Executive Summary
·
The Paycheck Protection
Program Increase Act of 2020 allocates $75 billion for hospitals and health
care providers to be distributed through the Public Health and Social Services
Emergency Fund, which the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES)
Act established in March.
·
The legislation does not
change any of the existing statutory language around the dispersals of that
funding, despite some concerns about the Department of Health and Human
Services’ methodology and timeline for distributing the first $100 billion that
the CARES Act allocated.
·
The legislation also
includes $25 billion for the research, development, validation, manufacturing,
purchase, and administration of COVID-19 testing.
Introduction
Late Tuesday, April 21, the Senate passed the
Paycheck Protection Program Increase Act of 2020 by unanimous consent. The vote
occurred after congressional Republicans and Democrats, as well as the White
House, reached a deal earlier in the day to provide additional funding for the
Paycheck Protection Program, established last month as part of the Coronavirus
Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act. In addition to money for
employers to keep up their payrolls, the Paycheck Protection Program Increase
Act of 2020 also includes $75 billion for hospitals and health care providers
along with $25 billion to expand testing. The House is expected to pass the
funding package later this week
Hospital and Health Care Provider Funding
The CARES Act provided $100 billion for
hospitals and health care providers to cover anticipated costs of responding to
the coronavirus as well as lost revenue due to a drastic reduction in elective
procedures. CARES tasked the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) with
dispersing the funds but provided no instructions or requirements for how it
should do so.
The so-called Marshall Plan for hospitals, as it
was billed at the time, has not been without controversy. It understandably
took HHS some time to determine how to distribute the funding, and the decision
to distribute the first $30 billion proportionally to providers across the
country based on Medicare revenue resulted in notable blowback. While HHS argued the
methodology provided the quickest route for distributing payments, it also
meant that providers not facing large cases of coronavirus received a
disproportionate share of the money. Lawmakers from states facing large outbreaks
were incensed at the decision, and while HHS did change the formula for the
remaining funds, it is somewhat surprising that Congress did not attempt to
include more specific instructions for how HHS should distribute the funds.
Ultimately the need to pass the funding bill without bringing members back to
Washington likely drove the decision to leave the language around the funding
unchanged.
Expanded Testing
The deal also provides $25 billion in funding
aimed at researching, developing, validating, manufacturing, purchasing,
administering, and expanding capacity for COVID-19 testing. While Democrats
were stymied in their demands for new, broad funding for states and localities
to respond to the pandemic, the bill does direct $11 billion of this funding to
states, localities, territories, and tribal governments. Those funds are
further divided, with $2 billion going to states directly, based on the same
formula used in CARES that created its own controversy (separate from the
controversy above); $4.25 billion allocated to states, localities, and
territories based on relative number of cases of COVID-19 (with this formula
perhaps aimed at mitigating some of the controversy around allocation to
states); and finally at least $750 million going to tribes, tribal
organization, and urban Indian health organizations. States, localities,
territories, and tribes will all be required to provide plans for how the
resources will be used specifically for testing and spread mitigation.
The bill also distributes funds to the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention, for coronavirus surveillance activities ($1
billion); the National Institutes of Health, for testing development ($1.8
billion); the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, also for
testing and diagnostics ($1 billion); the Food and Drug Administration, for
activities related to testing and diagnostics ($22 million); Community Health
Centers and rural health clinics ($825 million); and—sure to receive a lot of
ink in press releases—up to $1 billion to cover the cost of testing the
uninsured.
Conclusion
While Republicans have been pushing for a clean
funding bump for the Paycheck Protection Program without any additional funding
priorities, the legislation’s $100 billion for health providers and expanded
testing was substantially more limited than what Democrats were initially
seeking. Additionally, while the mechanisms around distributing public health
dollars under CARES have left some members of Congress and state leaders
frustrated, it is not surprising that this agreement does not take a more
active role dictating how the dollars will be distributed. The complicated
reality of lawmaking through unanimous consent and voice votes leaves little
wiggle room for changes. Further, it is unlikely this will be the last time
Congress considers additional funding related to the health care response to
the pandemic.
Disclaimer
https://www.americanactionforum.org/insight/additional-health-care-funding-in-the-paycheck-protection-program-increase-act/#ixzz6KM3ItKti
Follow @AAF on Twitter
https://www.americanactionforum.org/insight/additional-health-care-funding-in-the-paycheck-protection-program-increase-act/#ixzz6KM3ItKti
Follow @AAF on Twitter
No comments:
Post a Comment