Additionally, the top 5% of the
population accounted for over half of total healthcare spending in 2017,
according to a new statistical brief from AHRQ.
February 26,
2020 - The majority of total healthcare spending is concentrated in a
small percentage of the population, according to a new statistical
brief from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
(AHRQ).
Using data from the
agency’s Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Household Component (MEPS-HC),
researchers found that just 5 percent of the population accounted for over half
(50.1 percent) of total healthcare spending in 2017, which represented nearly
18 percent of the country’s gross domestic product (GDP) that year.
Of these individuals,
the top 1 percent of individuals ranked by their healthcare expenditures in
2017 represented about 22 percent of total healthcare spending that year, with
an annual mean expenditure of $116,331. This included all sources of healthcare
payments, including private insurance payments, Medicare, Medicaid,
out-of-pocket spending, and other sources.
The data underscored
the fact that just a select group of individuals drive healthcare spending. In
fact, the bottom 50 percent of the population represented just 2.9 percent of
total healthcare spending in 2017. People in this group spent less than $1,051
during the year, with an average annual expenditure of $305.
People who spent more
on healthcare tended to be older and white, and they spent more on inpatient
care compared to the bottom half of the population.
AHRQ researchers
found that nearly 40 percent of the expenses from the top 5 percent of the
population were for inpatient stays. Individuals in the bottom 50 percent of
the population spent next to nothing (0.1 percent) on inpatient care. Their
expenditures were more likely to go toward ambulatory events (54.3 percent).
AHRQ’s findings may
not come as a surprise to many healthcare providers. It is well known that a
small group of patients tend to drive healthcare spending. However, new
research has raised questions about how providers have typically cared for
these high-cost patients.
A study published
last month in the New England Journal of Medicine showed that
a “hotspotting” program in which providers gave high-cost patients more access
to providers and social services resources did not improve hospital readmission
rates.
“Our results suggest
that there are challenges for superutilizer programs aimed at medically and
socially complex populations,” wrote the researchers from MIT. “It is possible
that approaches to care management that are designed to connect patients with
existing resources are insufficient for these complex cases.”
The operator of the
program in the study – Camden Coalition of Healthcare Partners in New Jersey –
is not giving up on hotspotting. In response, the organization’s CEO Kathleen
Noonan said that
the study shows what they already know: care management that focuses solely on
healthcare is insufficient.
Research released
this month has renewed hope for the Coalition and other providers engaging in
similar programs. The American Journal of Managed Care study found
that a different program targeting high-cost patients was successful with
improving patient outcomes and cutting healthcare costs for the group.
Caring for high-cost
patients in a way that reduces their use of expensive and unnecessary services
is key to stopping the unsustainable trajectory of national healthcare
spending. The latest numbers from CMS actuaries show that
national healthcare spending hit $3.6 trillion in 2018 as medical expenditures
and prices grew across all major payers.
The number is a cause
of concern for policymakers who are actively trying to find policy solutions to
bring down healthcare spending. Recent policies have focused on price
transparency, alternative
payment models, site-neutral
payments, and surprise billing.
Policy and regulation
have been largely aimed at Medicare and Medicaid programs, which paid most
(48.3 percent) of the healthcare expenses for the top 5 percent of the
population in 2017, according to the AHRQ’s statistical brief.
However, another
datapoint may influence rules that affect privately insured patients. AHRQ
researchers found that out-of-pocket payments accounted for over a quarter of
the expenditures for the bottom 50 percent of the population, while they
comprised just 5.7 percent of total expenses for top 5 percent.
As patient financial
responsibility increases,
healthcare providers may have to focus their cost-cutting efforts not only on
their high-cost patients, but also those who are burdened by out-of-pocket
costs.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete