Targeted News Service (Press Releases)
April 24, 2018
WASHINGTON, April
23 -- The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation issued the following news release:
A new Kaiser Family
Foundation analysis of short-term, limited duration health plans for sale
through two major national online brokers finds big gaps in the benefits they
offer.
Through an
executive order and proposed new regulations, the Trump Administration is
seeking to encourage broader use of short-term, limited duration health plans
as a cheaper alternative to individual market plans that comply with the
Affordable Care Act's requirements. Repeal of the individual mandate penalty -
which currently applies to people buying short-term plans - is also expected to
boost enrollment starting next year.
The analysis
examines 24 distinct short-term insurance products currently marketed in 45
states and the District of Columbia through eHealth or Agile Health Insurance.
It finds:
* 43 percent do not cover mental
health services;
* 62 percent do not cover substance
abuse treatment;
* 71 percent do not cover outpatient
prescription drugs; and
* None of the plans cover maternity
care.
In seven states -
Alaska, California, Hawaii, Maryland, Montana, New Mexico and Utah - none of
the available short-term plans cover any of these four benefit categories. When
short-term plans do cover mental health, substance abuse, and prescription
drugs, the analysis finds they almost always include meaningful limitations and
exclusions that would not be permitted in ACA-compliant plans.
Short-term plans
traditionally have been marketed to people who experience temporary gaps in
coverage. Unlike ACA-compliant plans, short-term policies can deny or restrict
coverage to people with pre-existing conditions and are not required to cover
essential health benefits. They also can include dollar caps on coverage and
higher deductibles that would not be allowed under ACA-compliant individual
market and group health plans.
The analysis
confirms that these short-term plans often have premiums much lower than ACA
coverage - often 20 percent or less than the lowest-cost bronze plan available
through the ACA marketplace in the same location.
To the extent that
healthy individuals opt for cheaper short-term policies instead of
ACA-compliant plans, adverse selection would raise the cost of coverage for
people with health conditions who remain in the ACA-compliant market. Tax
credits would offset those higher premiums for low- to moderate-income people
who qualify for them, though middle-income families not eligible for subsidies
would likely face premium increases.
No comments:
Post a Comment