By Robert King | Mar 2, 2020 9:36am
The
Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear a challenge from red states that the
Affordable Care Act is unconstitutional, with the case likely to be heard this
fall.
The
case led by Texas and 17 red states is the third time the Supreme Court will
decide the fate of the ACA. The lawsuit focuses on whether the individual
mandate is constitutional and if the rest of the law should be taken down if
the mandate is not.
A
three-judge appellate panel ruled last year that the individual mandate,
which requires everyone to have health insurance, is unconstitutional. However,
it did not make a decision on whether the rest of the law should go, deferring
that issue back to a lower court that originally sided with the red states that
the law should be struck down entirely.
The
individual mandate's penalty is already zeroed out due to the 2017 tax reform
law. The red states' lawsuit argued that Congress intended for the rest of the
law to be struck down and that the ACA can't stand without the mandate.
A group
of 21 blue states that have been defending the law has countered that if
Congress wanted to get rid of the rest of the law then it would have done so,
but it only zeroed out the penalty.
The
blue states had appealed the Fifth Circuit's December 2019 decision to the
Supreme Court, wanting the justices to fast-track and take up the case. The
states had wanted the court to hear the case in its current term, meaning that
a decision would be rendered in June during the middle of the presidential election.
But the
court decided against hearing the case in its current term, and instead on
Monday decided to hear the case in its next term that starts in the
fall. It remains unclear if the court will hear oral arguments in the case
before the presidential election in early November.
The
Department of Justice has joined the red states in supporting the dismantling
of the ACA, but administration officials have been pressed by Democrats over a
lack of a plan should the law go away.
The
entire healthcare industry has been on edge over the fate of the law.
America's
Health Insurance Plans, the insurance industry's leading lobbying group,
applauded the high court's decision to hear the lawsuit.
"We
are confident that the Supreme Court will agree that the district court’s
original decision to invalidate the entire ACA was misguided and wrong,"
said AHIP President Matt Eyles in a statement.
This
will be the third time the Supreme Court considers a challenge to dismantle the
ACA. The last time was the case King v. Burwell in 2015, which argued the law's
subsidies were illegal unless distributed through a state-run insurance
exchange.
The
court struck down that challenge and another challenge in 2012 that the
individual mandate was unconstitutional.
No comments:
Post a Comment