Supreme Court Prepares to Hear Cases on Biden Vaccine Mandates

The Wall Street Journal: The question is whether OSHA acted within the law as written by Congress. It certainly didn’t as we read the law….  the separation of powers is crucial to safeguarding individual liberty. Justices now have two key tests on whether they will rein in the administrative state. They will have to decide if they take their major question and non-delegation doctrines seriously, or are they merely seminars at the Federalist Society? (WSJ). 

Businesses who have challenged the mandate argue: the mandate “is one of the most far-reaching and invasive rules ever promulgated by the Federal Government,” …. The companies also contended that the mandate “threatens to impose mass damage across the entire American economy including further hobbling already strained supply chains” (ScotusBlog). 

ADF: “The government has no authority to unilaterally treat unvaccinated employees like workplace hazards akin to asbestos or toxic chemicals, or to compel employers to carry out the government’s unlawful national vaccine mandate. The profoundly negative effect of this upon those employers and the 80 million American workers who are impacted is just one reason the Supreme Court immediately should halt enforcement of the mandate,” said ADF Senior Counsel Ryan Bangert (ADF).