by Leslie Small
As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to ravage the U.S. economy,
it would seem to be the perfect time for policymakers to explore a policy
option that has garnered rare bipartisan support: automatic health insurance
enrollment.
"We have huge numbers of people who are losing
employer-based coverage; most of them are eligible for some kind of help, but
we know historically most laid-off workers do not enroll in coverage for which
they qualify," said Stan Dorn, director of the National Center for
Coverage Innovation and senior fellow at Families USA. "It's just
overwhelming to be grappling with job loss and therefore it becomes imperative
to make enrollment as easy, seamless and automatic as possible."
Dorn was among several panelists who spoke during a May 18 webinar
about automatic health insurance enrollment, hosted by the USC-Brookings
Schaeffer Initiative for Health Policy and the American Enterprise Institute.
Current crisis aside, Dorn said he advocates helping eligible uninsured
individuals sign up for coverage when they’re filing their tax returns.
Christen Linke Young, a fellow at the USC-Brookings Schaeffer
Initiative for Health Policy, said that "retroactive enrollment" is
the best option. A federal "backstop" program would pay all claims
for uninsured people when they receive care, but when filing taxes they would
be responsible for paying income-adjusted premiums for the "plan"
they used. "It's the path toward universal coverage that is in my view
most feasible," she said.
Other panelists advocated for a more state-driven approach. One
way to accomplish that would be for the federal government to create an
incentive program that grants states new tools and authorities to build
automatic enrollment programs, according to James Capretta, a visiting fellow
at the American Enterprise Institute and senior fellow at the Ethics and Public
Policy Center.
During the current pandemic-related economic downturn, one
solution could be for states to move people who have lost their employer-based
coverage to a comparable Affordable Care Act marketplace plan, suggested Lanhee
Chen, a David and Diane Steffy fellow in American public policy studies at the
Hoover Institution. "I think certainly that would be a more affordable
route than, for example, subsidizing COBRA continuation coverage," he
said.
No comments:
Post a Comment