Portland Tribune (OR)
February 28, 2018
A voter referral to amend the Oregon Constitution to make
health care a fundamental right lacked enough votes to pass the Senate,
according to Senate leaders.
------------
SALEM - A legislative referral to ask voters to amend the
Constitution to make access to cost-effective and affordable health care the
right of all Oregon residents lacks the votes to pass the Senate, according to
Senate Democrats.
Despite proposed wording changes, "there were still
concerns about individual suing the state," said Sen. Laurie Monnes
Anderson, D-Gresham, chairwoman of the Senate Health Committee.
"We were just down to the wire. Trying to come to an
agreement on language changes was just really tough."
The measure, called House Joint Referral 203, passed the
House along party lines Feb. 13.
Monnes Anderson announced Monday, Feb. 26, that her
committee would not hold a vote on the referral. Even though the committee had
enough votes to send the measure to the Senate floor, there are not enough
votes to pass the bill in the larger body, she said.
"The bill would have needed extensive amendments for
it to get the support it needs in the Senate, and given this late timing in the
session, the committee chair made the difficult decision to not move forward
with it," said Senate Majority Leader Ginny Burdick, D-Portland.
Had the referral been approved in the Legislature, the
proposal would have gone to voters in the November general election.
In the House, all 35 Democrats voted for the measure,
while the 25 Republicans opposed it.
This is the third consecutive time the Senate has blocked
the referral, said Rep. Mitch Greenlick, D-Portland, who has repeatedly
sponsored the measure.
In light of federal efforts to overturn the Affordable
Care Act, Greenlick said it is important for Oregon voters to weigh in on
whether they want health care to be accessible to everyone.
"I think we are making a terrible mistake not to give
them the opportunity to tell us whether they really believe that universal
access to health care is something that our citizens deserve and that we should
take seriously as we consider how we move forward in dealing with the health
care system," he said.
Using a catchphrase from the 1984 science fiction film,
"The Terminator," Greenlick said: "I will be back."
The practical impact of creating such a right was unclear.
House Speaker Tina Kotek and Majority Leader Jennifer
Williamson, both Democrats from Portland, described the measure primarily as
"aspirational," but some legal experts said adding the right to the
Constitution could spur litigation.
"I think we all agree that health care should be an
inalienable right for everyone. I'm concerned that you send it to the voters
and the voters say yes and it comes back, at what expense do we pay for
it?" said Sen. Alan DeBoer, R-Ashland, a member of the Senate Health Care
Committee. "We need the federal government to come to the table. I have
always been a supporter of single payer
but how do you pay for it once you approve it and the
lawsuits?"
Paris Achen
Portland Tribune Capital Bureau
503-385-4899
https://insurancenewsnet.com/oarticle/universal-health-care-measure-dies-oregon-senate?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_content=subscriber_id:&utm_campaign=HealthNews03012018
No comments:
Post a Comment