Nov. 27, 2018
Dive
Brief:
- In its
latest attempt to lower drug costs, CMS released a proposed ruleMonday
that would allow Medicare Part D plans to use tools such as step therapy,
prior authorization and exclusion of protected drugs in certain
cases. For more than a decade, Part D plan sponsors have had to cover
drugs in six protected classes due to concerns over patient access. Those
requirements have been a barrier to cutting pharmaceutical costs, CMS
Administrator Seema Verma said during a conference call.
- The
proposed rule would impose requirements on Medicare Advantage plans that
seek to use step therapy to control costs for Part B drugs. Plans
would be required to only use step therapy when a patient starts a
new medication and the decision must be reviewed and approved by the
plan's pharmacy and therapeutics committee. Any Part B coverage issues
will be subject to shorter adjudication timeframes similar to those in the
Part D program.
- CMS is also proposing plans adopt
real-time prescription drug tools so doctors can check whether a
lower-cost drug is available for patients. The proposed rule, if
finalized, would go into effect in 2020, Verma said.
Dive
Insight:
If
a drug manufacturer raises the price of a protected drug beyond a certain
threshold it risks being excluded from payers' formularies, according to the
proposed rule. Payers could also exclude a protected class drug that
is not a significant innovation over the original product, Verma said
Monday.
The
proposed changes to protected class drugs could save the government more than
$2 billion over 10 years and enrollees more than $692 million, according to
CMS figures.
Verma has
criticized protected class drugs as a way to effectively bar Part D plans from
negotiating when private market plans can generate discounts of up to 30% for
the same drugs.
Part
D plans have to cover "essentially all available products" in
six classes: antiretrovirals, immunosuppressants, antidepressants,
antipsychotics, anticonvulsant agents and antineoplastics.
But
Verma said the policy was never meant to be a permanent solution to
guaranteeing patient access to key drugs for conditions like HIV. "The
protected class policy is in need of an update," she said.
However,
one patient advocacy group called it a potential "nightmare" for
cancer patients.
The
Community Oncology Alliance said it will subject patients to "fail first
step therapy and formulary restrictions that potentially restrict them from
receiving the evidence-based therapies that their trained physicians prescribe
as first line cancer treatment."
This
summer, the Trump administration unveiled its blueprint to lower drug costs and
out-of-pocket expenses for consumers. The plan, known as American Patients First,
outlined potential areas to target. This proposed rule sets into motion
some of the blueprint's ideas.
One
area for future consideration is redefining negotiated price as the baseline,
or the lowest possible payment to a pharmacy.
It
has become more common for the negotiated price to be higher than the final
payment to the pharmacy, affecting beneficiaries' out-of-pocket payments.
Redefining the negotiated price to reflect the lowest possible cost would
mean "beneficiaries receive the maximum benefit" at the pharmacy
counter, CMS said in its blog.
"The
policy CMS is considering would help with the higher prices that result in more
out-of-pocket spending for beneficiaries and faster advancement through the
Part D benefit, resulting in improved pricing transparency and market
competition," Leerink analysts wrote in a Nov. 26 note to investors.
The
industry group that represents payers commended the administration for a change
that will give them greater bargaining power.
"Drug
prices are out of control and leave too many Americans, including Medicare
beneficiaries, to choose between paying their bills and paying for
their medications," Matt Eyles, CEO of America's Health Insurance Plans,
said in a statement.
https://www.healthcaredive.com/news/cms-aims-to-tackle-drug-costs-by-giving-payers-more-bargaining-power/542979/
No comments:
Post a Comment