Eakinomics: Happy
Holidays from the Regulatory State
Congress is gone, Build Back Better is bust, and the holidays approach. So,
just to check whether anyone is paying attention, the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) issued a final rule on greenhouse gas emissions by
cars and light trucks (“light-duty vehicles” or LDVs) that with a cost of
$180 billion is – in the words
of AAF’s Dan Bosch – “the most expensive final rule tracked by the American
Action Forum since 2005.” Yikes. The rule is part of transportation sector
regulations that support an effort to meet the U.S. goal of reducing
nationwide emissions 50 percent from 2005 levels by 2030.
Recall that there are two relevant standards for car emissions. The more
familiar ones are the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards that
govern miles per gallon of fuel and are issued by the Department of
Transportation. The EPA rule dictates the grams-of-carbon-dioxide-per-mile
standard. It is entitled “Revised 2023 and Later Model Year Light-Duty
Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards,” and is more stringent
than the proposed emissions requirements
published in August (and $30 billion more expensive) and, in the process,
scraps a signature Trump Administration deregulatory action.
The EPA estimates a reduction of 3,125 million metric tons (MMT) due to the
final rule. This is compared to the baseline formed by the Trump-era rule and
about 40 percent more stringent than the rule as proposed in August. While
this is notable, considering what the Biden Administration will need to
achieve to reach its 2030 goal, the final rule remains modest at best.
According to Bosch, “the United States emitted more than 6,500 MMT of
greenhouse gases in 2019, with about 1,900 MMT from transportation sources.
The projected reductions from the final rule, therefore, are less than half
of the annual nationwide
total but spread over 28 years. A visual representation of the annual impact
of the final rule demonstrates the modest effect. The graph below shows the
effect the final rule’s projected reductions would have on the Energy
Information Administration’s (EIA) expected transportation sector emissions
until 2050, and also compares it to the proposed rule.”
The emissions targets in the Biden climate plan are ambitious, to say the
least. In the absence of something sensible (like an economy-wide, upstream
carbon tax), this is just the beginning of an expensive, sector-by-sector
regulatory drive.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment