Thanks to an international collaboration,
researchers have a database of DNA from thousands of tumors to draw from.
By Leslie Nemo
February 5, 2020 11:00 AM
Despite decades of cancer research, a
frustrating dilemma plagues doctors. Two people might have cancers that look
identical under the microscope, but which respond differently to the same
treatment. It's a reminder of cancer's frustrating complexity, and a challenge
for doctors.
Now, a massive collaboration among researchers
has taken an unprecedented look into the inner workings of cancer with a new
project that sequenced the genomes of more than 2,600 different tumors. The
project is revealing unexpected variation, the authors say.
“The most striking finding is how different one
person’s cancer genome is from another person’s,” says Peter Campbell, a cancer
geneticist with the Wellcome Sanger Institute.
Campbell is one of over 1,300 researchers who
participated in the Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes Consortium,
which released the
results of their sweeping genetic tumor analysis in a collection of 22 papers
in Nature research journals today. Their findings could help
doctors deliver cancer therapies tailored to a patient’s unique cancer genome,
and even help predict cancer years in advance.
Picking Tumors Apart
Tumors are masses of cells growing
uncontrollably. Cells in cancerous growths keep proliferating because of
genetic mutations that prevent cells from knowing when to stop duplicating.
Scientists have identified a specific set of DNA changes called "driver
mutations" that reliably kick off uncontrolled cell growth.
Years ago, scientists started extracting DNA
from cancerous cells and sequencing the portions that directly translate into
proteins. The effort picked out driver mutations in this part of their genome,
and helped doctors make more specific diagnoses about what kind of cancers
patients had.
But the DNA segments that code for proteins
account for only 1 percent of the genome, says Lincoln Stein, an oncologist
with the Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, and who was also involved with
the research. That leaves out many genes where mutations might nudge the cell
into cancerous growth.
So, for the Pan-Cancer Analysis, researchers
decided to sequence entire cancer genomes. The samples ultimately represented
38 types of tumors and came from over 2,500 donors, who also provided healthy
DNA so the researchers could see how the cancer-causing DNA changed over time.
The researchers found that most driver mutations
are in the DNA that codes for proteins. But many of them aren’t just small
changes in single spots — instead, they are entire stretches of flipped, cut or
reinserted DNA. Previously, oncologists found driver mutations in about
two-thirds of patients, says Campbell. With these larger-scale genetic
alterations added, the researchers found them in 91 percent of samples.
Sequencing also illuminated some of the
mechanisms behind how and when cancer-causing mutations accumulate. The
researchers calculated that the average cancer genome has four to five active
driver mutations. In some cases, they could even estimate how long ago the
mutations appeared. For some adult patients, it was during childhood.
Identifying mutations that could one day lead to
cancer might open the door to treatments that begin earlier than is currently
possible, Campbell says.
Better understanding the type and number of
driver mutations that define someone's cancer could also let physicians compare
any given patient's tumor to a larger database of similar cases. The resulting
information might give more precise insights into what treatments might work
best.
Cancer Clearinghouse
That dream is still far away. Sequencing a
cancer genome is still expensive, though the cost is falling, says Campbell.
The researchers also couldn’t find the mutations responsible for cancer in 5
percent of their samples — meaning there are more driver mutations left to be
found.
And even if researchers do a better job of
pairing therapies with specific driver mutation combinations, cancers are known
for developing resistance to treatments. “This sequencing will not mean cancers
are cured, but points us towards developing drugs for preventing and treating
resistance once it arises,” Campbell says.
Researchers will continue to solve these issues
as (hopefully) the database builds. “It’s the vision we all want to get to,”
Campbell says.
No comments:
Post a Comment