Cuts
to safety net entitlement programs would pose a significant risk to providers'
reimbursement of care for older, sicker and disabled populations.
Susan Morse, Associate Editor
Susan Morse, Associate Editor
OCT
23
The 2018 federal
budget and tax reform plan that narrowly passed the Senate on Thursday includes
large proposed cuts to Medicare and Medicaid.
The cuts to two safety
net entitlement programs would pose a significant risk to providers' reimbursement of
care for older, sicker and disabled populations.
Though the provisions
need additional legislation before moving forward, the budget takes $473
billion out of Medicare and about $1 trillion from Medicaid over the next
decade.
The Republican
proposal has been to end Medicaid as a federal entitlement and give money in
block grants to states based on the number of beneficiaries per state.
The fear from those
objecting to the plan is that the block grants would not provide enough funds.
The effects of per
capita caps could have significant consequences for people's healthcare,
providers and insurers, according to a report from The Commonweath Fund. For
example, states might reduce already-low payment rates, forcing out many
current providers.
If federal spending
updates lag behind rising healthcare costs, states might reduce managed care
payments, triggering the demise of managed care plans, the report said. Or
states might narrow eligibility to control costs, perhaps eliminating some
coverage.
Medicaid expansion,
which is on the chopping block, was shown to lower the cost of uncompensated
care for hospitals. Uncompensated care burdens fell sharply in expansion states
between 2013 and 2015, from 3.9 percent to 2.3 percent of operating costs.
Estimated savings across all hospitals in Medicaid expansion states totaled
$6.2 billion, according to The Commonweath Fund.
In Medicare funding,
policymakers have long proposed converting the program to a premium support
system as a way to reduce federal spending.
The Congressional Budget Office earlier
this month, at the request of Congress, updated its analysis of the plan that
reportedly has the attention of Republicans looking to cut $473 billion from
the program.
Under premium support,
beneficiaries would choose health insurance from a list of competing plans, and
the federal government would share the cost of their premiums.
Private insurers would
submit bids by region, indicating the amount they would accept to provide
Medicare benefits to a beneficiary in average health.
In the options CBO
analyzed, the federal government's contribution would be determined from
insurers' bids, and Medicare's traditional fee-for-service program would be
included as a competing plan.
In two funding
scenarios, net federal spending for Medicare could be reduced between $184 and
$419 billion between 2022 and 2026, the CBO said.
If current
beneficiaries are grandfathered to existing Medicare, net federal spending for
Medicare would be reduced by $21 to $50 billion between 2022 and 2026.
In their report, the
CBO said it assumed that the provision of the Social Security Act that
prohibits out-of-network providers from charging more than Medicare's
fee-for-service rates to treat Medicare beneficiaries in private plans would be
retained under the premium support options.
CBO also assumed that
the Medicare FFS program would
be offered as a competing plan.
If either feature was
removed, CBO said, private insurers' payment rates to providers would be higher
than those projected, and the savings from the premium support options would be
smaller.
Twitter: @SusanJMorse
Email the writer: susan.morse@himssmedia.com
Email the writer: susan.morse@himssmedia.com
No comments:
Post a Comment