Six months after the
Trump administration issued final regulations to expand association health
plans as an alternative to coverage through Affordable Care Act (ACA)
exchanges, AHP sponsorship is slowly moving forward. A national AHP coalition,
launched in August, has grown to a diverse array of 22 members of large and
small trade associations, including the American Farm Bureau Federation and
National Restaurant Association.
Attorney Christopher
Condeluci, principal of CC Law & Policy in Washington, D.C., is running the
Coalition to Protect and Promote Association Health Plans. He describes
interest in AHPs as "sky high," though he concedes "take-up has
been relatively modest." He ascribes this partly to some states, given
flexibility under the federal regulations, prohibiting carriers from
underwriting fully insured large group plans.
Nationwide, Condeluci
estimates there are eight or so "anti-AHP" states, including
Connecticut, Massachusetts, New York, Oregon and Pennsylvania.
He dismisses critics'
concerns that consumers could end up with skimpy coverage through AHPs, which
are exempt from many ACA rules even though they cannot discriminate based on
health status.
"We are not like
short-term limited duration plans [also promoted by the Trump administration],
because we must comply with coverage requirements, and are voluntarily
providing essential health benefits," Condeluci says. "And the reason
is, these organizations are membership driven. They're not able to offer skimpy
coverage or skinny plans to their members. If they did, their members would
leave, and they wouldn't attract new members."
"In theory, if there
were an individual market where the premiums were more competitive than the
AHP, then there would be no AHP," Condeluci adds. "If coverage is more
affordable and just as comprehensive, then people will go with that." For
this reason, he asserts that everyone will be attracted to AHPs to the same
extent, and the market segmentation feared by critics — in which only healthy
individuals shift to AHPs and sicker people stay on exchanges — won't occur,
especially among subsidized exchange plan enrollees.
"That doesn't
surprise me, that associations are offering benefits consistent with the
small-group market," says Kevin Lucia, a research professor at Georgetown
University Health Policy Institute's Center on Health Insurance Reforms.
"It's how they rate their members."
From Health Plan Weekly
No comments:
Post a Comment