Just Released
|
||
“Partial” Medicaid Expansions Could
Limit States’ Spending But Cover Fewer People at a Higher Federal Cost
Compared to Traditional ACA Expansions
If states were able to receive enhanced Affordable
Care Act matching funds for “partial” expansions of Medicaid, fewer people
would get health coverage and the federal government would spend more,
compared to a traditional expansion under the law, KFF explains in a new brief.
The explainer describes how a partial expansion
would differ from a traditional ACA Medicaid expansion and summarizes some of
the expected effects. It also documents which states have sought federal
approval for a partial expansion, and the result.
Under a traditional ACA Medicaid expansion, states
extend Medicaid coverage to individuals with incomes up to 138 percent of the
federal poverty level. The federal government then covers the vast majority
of the cost (93% in 2019, and 90% in 2020 and beyond), with the state paying
the rest.
Some states are seeking to implement their
Medicaid expansion with enhanced federal matching funds, but limit coverage
to adults with incomes below the poverty line, leaving adults between 100
percent and 138 percent of poverty in the federal ACA marketplace. Covering
those individuals in the ACA marketplace, which is subsidized wholly by the
federal government, would limit Medicaid enrollment and save state dollars,
but could result in limited coverage and increased federal costs relative to
full expansion.
CMS has not approved previous waiver requests
seeking enhanced matching funds for partial expansions in Arkansas and
Massachusetts. Both states had already implemented full expansions but wanted
to roll eligibility back to 100 percent of poverty. Utah, where full
expansion was adopted via ballot initiative in November, has a waiver request
pending with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for a
partial Medicaid expansion with enhanced ACA matching funds.
Also available is a new KFF brief providing an overview of the different
approaches states have taken in adopting Medicaid expansion.
Filling the need for trusted information on
national health issues, the Kaiser Family Foundation is a
nonprofit organization based in San Francisco, California.
|
||
|
||
To be a Medicare Agent's source of information on topics affecting the agent and their business, and most importantly, their clientele, is the intention of this site. Sourced from various means rooted in the health insurance industry - insurance carriers, governmental agencies, and industry news agencies, this is aimed as a resource of varying viewpoints to spark critical thought and discussion. We welcome your contributions.
Thursday, February 21, 2019
“Partial” Medicaid Expansions Could Limit States’ Spending But Cover Fewer People at a Higher Federal Cost Compared to Traditional ACA Expansions
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment