Sam Baker
August 29, 2017
Taking care of
the aging population is a crisis in the making, and no one — not families, not
government programs and not the health care workforce — is prepared for it.
The big
picture: Providing health care to aging Baby Boomers will strain
Medicare’s finances, but the problem is even bigger than that.
Long-term care — the
kind of services typically performed in a nursing home or by a home health aide
— largely falls through the cracks of both public and private health insurance,
saddling seniors and their families with financial and emotional burdens they
often didn’t anticipate or plan for.
·
“It’s a problem nobody’s talking about,”
said David Grabowski, a health policy professor at Harvard who studies
long-term care. “Part of that’s just, these are hard issues to think about.
Nobody wants to think about getting old and needing care. But part of it is
that these are really hard problems.”
By the
numbers: Estimates differ on the specifics, but they generally agree that
somewhere between half and two-thirds of seniors will need at least some
long-term care.
·
Today’s seniors will incur an average of $138,000 in long-term
care bills, according to one federal study.
·
Even middle-class seniors are largely unable to cover those
costs, according to a study published earlier this year, which Grabowski
co-wrote.
How it
works: Medicare doesn’t cover most long-term care services. The market
for private long-term care insurance is tiny and fraught with failure.
·
That leaves three real options: Be rich enough to pay out of pocket,
be poor enough to qualify for Medicaid, or lean on family and volunteer
caregivers.
·
In many cases, seniors must do all three: They begin paying out
of pocket, then quickly spend everything they have, making them
Medicaid-eligible, but still rely on family members for at least some
additional help.
Medicaid is
already the biggest line item in most states’ budgets — so as the need
for long-term care grows, it will cost seniors, families, states and the
federal government all at the same time.
The intrigue: A lot of
long-term care has recently shifted away from nursing homes and toward home
care or community-based options like assisted-living facilities.
·
That’s a good thing for seniors, but “the challenge with it is
it sort of widens this gap between the haves and the have-nots,” Grabowski
said.
·
Medicaid is still structurally tilted toward nursing homes, and
when it does pay for home care, it doesn’t pay home care workers very well.
That
leads to yet another problem — high turnover among nurses and
caregivers, which isn’t great for patients.
·
Home care workers are also predominantly immigrants, tying this
issue up with yet another charged political debate.
The bottom
line: I asked Richard Johnson, who leads the Urban Institute’s
program on retirement, why there isn’t a bigger political constituency to change
this system.
·
“If you provided this benefit, let’s say you made paid home care
more affordable, there’s always a concern that it could lead to less family
care,” he said.
·
“Look at child care,” he said. “We don’t have much of that,
either.”
No comments:
Post a Comment