Christopher Holt August 16, 2019
This
week, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released two reports
detailing insurance coverage in the individual market: first, a snapshot of
Affordable Care Act (ACA) exchange enrollment as of February, and second, an
analysis of individual market enrollment trends both on and off the ACA
exchanges. The key takeaway from the two reports is that the ACA exchanges show evidence of
stabilizing, while trends in the broader individual market provide cause for
concern.
Looking at the figures for the exchanges, the
marketplace appears to be, at least on average, relatively settled. The total
number of exchange enrollees who had signed up for a plan and paid their first
month’s premium in February 2019 was 10.6 million, down just over 60,000 from
February 2018—not a big drop. Eighty-seven percent of exchange enrollees
received a premium subsidy, the same as in 2018, and 52 percent of enrollees
were eligible for cost-sharing reduction (CSR) payments from insurers, compared
to 53 percent in 2018—again, steady as she goes. Additionally, previous AAF
analysis found that the average 2019 benchmark Silver plan premium was only 1
percent higher than the average 2018 benchmark plan premium. The lowest-cost
2019 Bronze plan premium in each rating area was also up an average of just 1
percent over 2018, though the lowest-cost Gold plan premium increased 14
percent on average between 2018 and 2019.
At the same time, total individual market
coverage—including both people who purchase insurance outside of the exchange
as well as through it—declined by 2.4 million from 2016 to 2018. This
drop in overall individual market coverage is the result of individuals who do
not qualify for premium subsidies leaving the individual market over that
period. In response, CMS Administrator
Seema Verma raised the alarm, saying, “People are fleeing the individual
market. Obamacare is failing the American people, and the ongoing exodus of the
unsubsidized population from the market proves that Obamacare’s sky-high
premiums are unaffordable.”
Without a doubt it is true that rising premiums both
on and off the exchanges are driving the exodus of unsubsidized Americans from
the individual market. These premium hikes are due first—and primarily—to the
ACA’s insurance market reforms and, more recently, to the Trump
Administration’s decision to cease reimbursement to insurers for CSRs. At
the same time, the data are a bit more complicated than it might first appear.
For example, while there were 2.5
million fewer unsubsidized enrollees in the individual market as a whole in
2018 than in 2016, the number of unsubsidized enrollees through the ACA
exchanges only dropped by 293,000 over that period. Additionally,
according to the administration’s analysis there were still more unsubsidized
individuals in the individual market in 2018 than there were in 2014, though
just barely.
Overall,
there were fewer enrollees in the individual market on and off exchange in 2018
than in any other year since 2014, but whether that decline will continue is
harder to predict. The danger, of
course, is that as there are fewer unsubsidized and comparatively healthier
individuals in the market, there will be more upward pressure on premiums,
which in turn would drive up federal subsidy spending. The Trump
Administration has been moving to provide low-cost insurance options to
individuals who don’t qualify for subsidies, but it’s too soon to see what
effect those policy efforts will have. Overall, the reports paint a picture of
an ACA marketplace that is mostly static, while trends in the broader
individual market could potentially indicate future instability.
https://www.americanactionforum.org/weekly-checkup/the-state-of-the-individual-health-insurance-market/#ixzz5x5DVoL2q
Follow @AAF on Twitter
Follow @AAF on Twitter
No comments:
Post a Comment