CMS on Feb. 5 issued a 900-page proposed rule containing a slew
of non-rate-related changes to the Medicare Advantage and Part D programs for
contract years 2021 and 2022.
"There are not game-changers in this regulation, but there
are another series of program tweaks that are, in total, pretty helpful to
MAOs," observes Michael Adelberg, a principal with Faegre Drinker
Consulting.
One of the more interesting proposals includes CMS's first
attempt to regulate imitators of Dual Eligible Special Needs Plan (D-SNPs),
points out Adelberg. CMS in the 2020 draft Call Letter had discussed the
proliferation of so-called "D-SNP look-alike" plans, and the agency
maintained that they may undermine state efforts to promote further integration
of Medicare and Medicaid benefits.
CMS in the new proposed rule said it would not enter into or
renew an MA contract for a non-SNP plan if: (1) a plan projected in its bid
that 80% or more of its total enrolled population is also eligible for Medicaid
benefits, or (2) 80% of its actual enrollment are dual eligibles. MA plans
whose membership exceeds this threshold would be able to transition their
membership into a D-SNP or another $0 premium plan offered by the MAO,
suggested CMS.
"CMS could have twisted itself and everyone else into
pretzels seeking to define a D-SNP look-alike," points out Adelberg.
"But instead, they propose an enrollment threshold, which is a much more
straightforward approach."
Meanwhile, one plan-friendly change was a proposal around
network adequacy and telehealth. CMS in the new rule proposed allowing MA plans
to receive a "10 percent credit" on meeting published time and
distance standards when contracting with telehealth providers for five
specialty types.
Another piece of good news for plans was a proposal to include
in their medical loss ratio (MLR) calculation covered services delivered by
entities that do not meet the definition of "provider." As CMS
codifies subregulatory guidance and statutory changes that have expanded the
types of supplemental benefits that MA plans may include in their plan benefit
packages, the agency said that such benefits need not be delivered by an
individual or entity that falls under the provider standard.
No comments:
Post a Comment