There’s
always hope when something is floated as a potential treatment option for a
frightening illness. That’s been the case with chloroquine and the closely
related drug hydroxychloroquine, which have been touted by President Trump as strong options to
treat Covid-19.
But these
drugs haven’t been through rigorous clinical trials for the treatment of the
coronavirus yet.
On
Monday, the World Health Organization said they "eagerly await" the
outcomes of studies on these drugs, but officials cautioned there was no
“empirical evidence” they work and that doctors need to watch for side effects.
One thing
to understand about a lot of these early studies is the sample sizes are small
or aren’t randomized. We should wait for more definitive studies to see if
these drugs actually have any benefit at all against the coronavirus.
Meanwhile,
we use early tests for clues. Some doctors have shared anecdotal success.
Others have shared failures.
There
have been growing concerns about the impact the medications can have on the
heart. A preliminary study in Brazil was halted early after several patients
being treated with chloroquine died. But in that study, drug doses were much
higher than what’s used in the United States. Last week in Sweden, hospitals
sent guidance to doctors not to use chloroquine to treat Covid-19 patients
outside of clinical trials.
Also last
week, the American Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology and
the Heart Rhythm Society issued guidance about critical cardiovascular
considerations for the use of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin to
treat the novel coronavirus, saying doctors must consider “potential serious
implications for people with existing cardiovascular disease.”
The US
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has removed from its
website guidelines for doctors on how to prescribe the two drugs.
The page with CDC guidance is shorter and no longer gives dosage information
about the drugs.
No comments:
Post a Comment