April 14, 2020 Paul S. Nestadt, MD1
Author
Affiliations Article Information JAMA. 2020;323(14):1409-1410. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.1446
To the Editor Dr Olfson and colleagues1 examined trends in the rates of
opioid-related mortality, stratified by intentionality. Concerns about whether
a significant proportion of opioid overdose suicides have been misclassified,
and therefore that the suicide component of the opioid epidemic is underestimated,
cannot be answered with death certificate data.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
has been struggling with the difficulty of classifying suicides among overdose
deaths for years.2 Several studies have estimated
the proportion of misclassification in the National Violent Death Reporting
System, using suicide notes or advanced statistical methods, and have generally
agreed on a figure ranging between 21% and 33%.3,4 Therefore, it seems likely that a
significant number of suicides is hidden within deaths from the opioid
epidemic.
The authors stated that “the sensitivity of
death certificates for suicide is high.”1 However, death investigation
experts2,5 suggest that the specificity for
suicide is high, but the sensitivity is low, particularly for overdose deaths.
For a variety of reasons, including stigma and evidentiary standards, suicides
may be more likely than unintentional deaths to be left undetermined. This is
supported by the authors’ statement that “[u]ndetermined overdose deaths tend
to more closely resemble suicides than unintentional deaths.”1 In a recent study, machine
learning techniques were used to estimate that, based on this resemblance, 33%
of Utah’s undetermined overdose deaths were likely suicides.4 These estimates may be improved
with psychological autopsies (in-depth interviews with trained investigators)
on a subset of decedents to validate coroner-cataloged manner of death.
The authors found that few (4%) opioid
overdose deaths were classified as suicides. However, the validity of the
classification of overdose deaths as suicide vs undetermined or unintentional
deaths was inadequately questioned. Given the increasing prevalence of opioid
use and the particular lethality of opioids as a suicide method, their role in
suicide demands better measurement, recognition, and attention. Those caring
for persons at risk of suicide should be counseled to treat opioids as they
would a firearm: removed whenever possible, stored safely inaccessible from
those in crisis, and kept only with safeguards (such as Narcan) readily
available.
Section Editor: Jody W. Zylke, MD, Deputy Editor.
Article Information
Corresponding Author: Paul S. Nestadt, MD, Department of
Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 600 N
Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287 (pnestadt@jhmi.edu).
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
References
1.Olfson M , Rossen LM , Wall MM , Houry D , Blanco C . Trends in intentional and unintentional opioid overdose
deaths in the United States, 2000-2017. JAMA.
2019;322(23):2340-2342. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.16566
ArticlePubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
ArticlePubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.Stone DM , Holland KM , Bartholow B , et al. Deciphering
suicide and other manners of death associated with drug intoxication: a Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention consultation meeting summary. Am J Public Health. 2017;107(8):1233-1239.
doi:10.2105/AJPH.2017.303863PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.Rockett IRH , Caine ED , Stack S , et al. Method
overtness, forensic autopsy, and the evidentiary suicide note: a multilevel
National Violent Death Reporting System analysis. PLoS One. 2018;13(5):e0197805. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0197805PubMedGoogle Scholar
4.Liu D , Yu M , Duncan J , Fondario A , Kharrazi H , Nestadt PS . Discovering the unclassified suicide cases among
undetermined drug overdose deaths using machine learning techniques. Suicide Life Threat Behav. Published online
September 19, 2019. doi:10.1111/sltb.12591PubMedGoogle Scholar
5.Goodin J , Hanzlick R . Mind your manners: part II: general results from the
National Association of Medical Examiners manner of death questionnaire, 1995. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1997;18(3):224-227.
doi:10.1097/00000433-199709000-00002PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
No comments:
Post a Comment