Professor Challenges the
Nursing Home Industry’s "Nursing-Home-As-Victim" Narrative
In
an article published in the Georgetown
Law Journal, Law
Professor Nina A. Kohn challenges the nursing home industry’s narrative that
nursing facilities are victims of COVID-19. The industry successfully
used this false narrative during the coronavirus pandemic to lobby for billions
of dollars in additional federal funding as well as protections from legal liability.
In addition to the inadequate public health response to the pandemic, Kohn
describes, “deliberate policy choices and regulatory failures that have shaped
long-term care in the U.S. and enabled nursing homes to make choices that have
long endangered the health and welfare of their residents.” [Nina A.
Kohn, “Nursing Homes, COVID-19, and the Consequences of Regulatory Failure,” Georgetown Law Journal, Vol.
110, p. 3 (Spring 2021).]
Professor
Kohn describes four key factors:
- Historical regulatory gaps (most significantly, the rules’
failure to require “sufficient nursing staff and an adequate ratio of
staff providing resident care to residents receiving care”);
- Under-enforcement of existing regulations (caused by state
inspectors’ failure to identify quality of care problems or identifying
them “as less severe than they actually are”);
- States’ failure “to penalize violations and to ensure
correction” (Most violations do not lead to any monetary fines; the Trump
Administration intensified the problem of under-enforcement by shifting to
per instance civil money penalties, among other changes); and
- “Medicaid’s preferential treatment of institutional care
relative to community-based care.”
Kohn
offers several regulatory reform options “that would better align nursing
homes’ incentives with quality care:”
- Strengthening enforcement of existing requirements by
“improving the quality of the survey process to ensure that deficiencies
are accurately identified and categorized,” “imposing monetary fines for a
broader range of violations,” and applying enforcement to owners and
operators, not individual facilities.
- Linking payment to outcomes, such as enactment of “a robust
pay-for-performance system.” Kohn notes that the windfall payments
to facilities during the pandemic have been “almost entirely devoid of
conditions” for payment and “much of it may not have been spent on patient
care.”
- Requiring facilities to provide at least 4.1 hours of direct
care staff per resident per day or to adopt minimum staffing ratios or
enacting a federal law to require facilities receiving Medicare or
Medicaid reimbursement, or both, “to spend a threshold percentage of those
funds – or a percentage of their aggregate revenue – on direct resident
care (as opposed to spending it on administrative costs or simply
pocketing it).”
- Eliminating Medicaid’s preference for institutional
care.
The full article is available at https://www.law.georgetown.edu/georgetown-law-journal/wp-content/uploads/sites/26/2021/04/Kohn_Nursing-Homes-COVID-19-and-the-Consequences-of-Regulatory-Failure.pdf.
No comments:
Post a Comment