Non-Negotiable:
Self-Insured Employers Can’t Negotiate with Hospitals
As health care
prices continue to climb, employers everywhere are looking for ways to save
money on health costs. A recent study
published by the American Journal
of Managed Care looked at the ability of large, self-insured
employers in geographic markets to negotiate with hospitals. The findings
were not encouraging.
The study found that, on a scale measuring market power of 0-10,000 (where 0
is an extremely competitive market and 10,000 is a monopolized market), the
mean value of employer market power in 2016 for large, self-insured employers
was 62, while the mean value of hospital market power was 5,410. There was a
slight correlation between increased employer market power and decreased
hospital prices: a 65-point increase in employer market power led to $430 in
savings on hospital prices – on a mean hospital price of $23,911. Which is to
say, the average employer would have to more than double its market power in order to reap a
measly 1.8 percent in savings.
The study notes that between 2005-2019, the difference in hospital prices
paid by employers versus those paid by Medicare rose from 10 percent above
the Medicare rate to over 100 percent above the Medicare rate. (A side note:
the 100 percent figure is much lower than the private payer vs. Medicare rate
differences found by the Kaiser
Family Foundation and the RAND
Corporation, which exceed 200 percent.) The increase noted in the
study may be due to rising costs and hospital consolidation, as well as
Medicare underpayment. Whatever the exact cause, the reality is that the
increase cuts into employee compensation and may be a contributor to
depressed employee wages as companies have to spend increasingly more on
benefits. For private businesses and their employees, this is unsustainable.
The lack of negotiating power is not a small issue. According to the U.S. Census
Bureau, 55.1 percent of Americans in 2018 had employment-based
coverage. Self-insured companies make up the large majority of employers. To
cope with rising costs, employers have a few options: They can try to
negotiate with the insurer for better rates, they can try to negotiate
directly with hospitals in the area for better prices, or they can pass on
some costs to their employees through high-deductible health plans (HDHPs) in
order to keep premiums low. Self-insured employers are, by definition, on the
hook for the risk in health plans, so there isn’t much to negotiate with the
insurer administering the plan. And, as the study shows, employers don’t have
enough market power to be able to negotiate with hospitals. This brings us to
the third option: more HDHPs. The HDHP option is increasingly utilized by
employers – 50.5 percent
of workers were enrolled in an HDHP in 2019. The downside of HDHPs
is obvious: If you have to use the health care system, you’re responsible for
a lot of the cost (the average
HDHP deductible was $2,303 in 2019), and good luck
bargaining with hospitals on your own.
The study presents purchasing alliances with state or local government
employee groups as a means to increase bargaining power, but the ability to
do this depends on the state. Another solution could be the use of
association health plans (AHPs), but the ability to use AHPs was constrained
by a 2019 ruling
striking down most of a Department of Labor (DOL) rule that greatly relaxed
the requirements for AHPs (the ruling was appealed but that appeal has been
delayed). While the DOL final rule was certainly flawed – it
stretched the definition of “commonality of interest” so much Simone Biles
would be jealous – allowing businesses to join together to help provide their
employees cheaper insurance should be
encouraged by the government. A major issue with the rule was that
it didn’t comport with current standards set by the Employment Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). Maybe it’s time for Congress to adjust
ERISA and allow employers to up their negotiating leverage over health systems.
Otherwise, expect health costs to continue to increase at the expense of
wages.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment