February
11, 2022 Christopher Holt
This
week Senators Catherine Cortez Masto and Todd Young introduced bipartisan legislation,
the Telehealth Extension and Evaluation Act, aimed at continuing
COVID-19-related changes to Medicare’s coverage of telehealth services beyond
the public health emergency (PHE). Expanded access to telehealth has
been one of the silver linings of the pandemic, and lawmakers are eager to
build on these temporary policies, but caution is warranted. Not all
pre-pandemic telehealth regulations were without merit, not all telehealth
visits are created equal, and it’s not clear that telehealth and in-person care
should be treated as entirely interchangeable.
Back in March 2020, the Trump Administration made a number
of changes to
Medicare’s telehealth policies under the PHE. For the duration of the
PHE, Medicare will reimburse providers for telehealth visits at the same rates
as corresponding office or hospital visits, allow patients to participate from
their homes—without traveling to a designated facility—and drop requirements
that patients must have a preexisting relationship with the provider from whom
they receive telehealth. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) also
waived penalties for good-faith violations of patient confidentiality under
the Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). As a result,
providers and patients can use free video conferencing services. These policy
changes will end along with the PHE, however.
There
is no reason to expect the Biden Administration is close to ending the PHE, but
lawmakers are moving to ensure these policies remain in place thereafter. The
Cortez Masto/Young bill would extend the PHE-related policy changes for a full
two years beyond the end of the PHE, while making a few additional changes.
Their legislation would require at least one in-person visit in the previous 12
months before a provider could prescribe certain high-cost durable medical
equipment or lab tests, and mandate that providers submit details to Medicare
on the types of clinicians delivering services via telehealth. Both these
provisions are based on MedPAC recommendations. The legislation also mandates
HHS to study the effects of changes to Medicare’s telehealth coverage policies
during the pandemic, which would inform future policymaking.
Telehealth
visits have skyrocketed during the COVID-19 pandemic, as recent analysis shows.
According to the Kaiser
Family Foundation, virtual visits accounted for 13 percent of all
outpatient visits from March-August of 2020, 11 percent from September
2020-February 2021, and 8 percent from March-August of 2021. While the
prevalence of telehealth visits is declining, they made up less than half a
percent of all outpatient visits prior to March 2020. Patients and
providers have embraced telehealth, and virtually no one wants to revert to the
policies that existed before the pandemic. That said, simply extending HHS’s
pandemic-related deregulatory actions is probably not the best way to proceed.
For example, HIPAA’s privacy protections exist for good reason and waiving them
permanently would be unwise. Further, it’s not at all clear that payment parity
between telehealth and in-person visits is the correct payment policy. It’s
also not clear that audio-only telehealth visits are equivalent to video visits
in terms of patient outcomes or cost to providers. Audio visits are popular
with seniors, who are less likely to use video conferencing, but do they
provide the same benefit in every instance? And should they be reimbursed at
the same rate as video visits?
This disruption of the pandemic has opened the door to revisiting telehealth, but simply extending the current waivers seems unhelpful. Lawmakers, of course, are seeking to give themselves more runway to fully evaluate telehealth policies before making any changes permanent, while also preventing a reversion to pre-pandemic regulation. But two years after the end of the PHE is a long time, and the longer these provisions remain in place, the harder it will be to modify them down the road.
https://www.americanactionforum.org/weekly-checkup/telehealth-policy-after-the-pandemic/#ixzz7MIsnn6eN
Follow @AAF on Twitter
No comments:
Post a Comment