Eakinomics:
Deciphering the 4th Quarter GDP Data
Yesterday the Department of Commerce released the 1st estimates
of gross domestic product (GDP) in the 4th quarter of 2022. The release is a
timely reminder of the difficulty in gauging the strength of and outlook for
the economy.
First, the data are, literally, already economic history that does not
directly inform anyone of the conditions on January 27, 2023. A constant challenge
for policymakers is the fact that most of the statistically valid data
arrives with a lag; only anecdotes and non-representative data are typically
available in real time.
Second, the data often do not tell a single, cohesive story. For example, the
top-line growth rate for GDP was 2.9 percent (at an annual rate). That sounds
good (especially compared to a consensus forecast of 2.6 percent) and led
some outlets to characterize growth as “strong.”
Unfortunately, fully one-half (1.46 percentage points) of that growth rate is
due to a rise in inventories. Inventory fluctuations are often transitory and
quickly reversed. Is growth strong if it is about to fall off a cliff?
Also, one piece of good news is that personal consumption expenditures (PCE)
grew across the board: 0.5 percent for durable goods, 1.5 percent for
non-durable goods, and 2.6 percent for services. This is in contrast to a
mixed picture in the 3rd quarter. So, the much-awaited demise in household
spending does not appear in these data.
But that might not be good news because equipment investment turned negative
for the second time in three quarters, falling at an annual rate of 3.7
percent. In every postwar recession except the pandemic, a decline in
business spending led the downturn and was followed a quarter or two later by
falling PCE.
Finally, the strongest piece of data in the report was the fact that the
price index for market-based PCE only rose at an annual rate of 3.8 percent,
down from 5.0 percent in the 3rd quarter. This is the Fed’s preferred measure
of inflation. Does the slower inflation change the trajectory of future Fed
policy and thus the economy?
In short, the data are signaling either strength, or weakness, or a change in
future policy. Clear as mud!
The third reason that putting together a cohesive story on the outlook is
difficult is that different data paint a different picture. Yesterday the
Census Bureau released data
on new orders for capital goods in December. Orders for non-defense capital
goods, excluding aircraft, fell 0.2 percent in December (an annual rate of
-2.4 percent). This is a leading indicator of future business investment and
mirrors the weak investment data in the GDP report. But the Department of
Labor released
weekly data on new claims for unemployment insurance
benefits, which fell. This strength in the labor market cuts in the direction
of strength in the economy.
Yesterday the Department of Commerce released the 4th quarter GDP data. It
did not settle any major debate on the economic outlook.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment