Easy to set up and accessible to a broader range
of investors, donor-advised funds help clients achieve charitable goals and
give advisers something to talk about
March 22, 2020 By Mark Schoeff
Jr
Fortune
500 executive client of Dan Rinzema’s had a lot of appreciated stock on his
hands and felt charitably inclined. So Mr. Rinzema, chief client officer at
Greenleaf Trust, turned to a donor-advised fund to help the client with both
his tax and giving needs.
The
increasingly popular vehicle allows investors to make contributions of cash or
appreciated assets – such as public securities, private stock, real estate or art
– that qualify for a charitable tax deduction. Once assets have been put in
such a fund, investors can make grants to the charities of their choice.
Donor-advised
funds facilitate large donations that exceed the higher standard deduction
ushered in by the 2017 tax reform law and
qualify investors for a tax deduction equal to the fair market value of the
donation.
Using a
donor-advised fund enabled Mr. Rinzema to “match a high-deduction year with a
high-income year” and help the executive avoid capital gains taxes by gifting
appreciated stocks, as opposed to cash. Just as importantly, the client can
dole out charitable contributions from the DAF.
“They
allow us to create impact in the community the way the client wants, while
ensuring tax efficiencies,” Mr. Rinzema said.
The
funds are touted as a way to strengthen client relationships because they allow
financial advisers to start a conversation with clients about strategic
charitable giving, even if the clients only make modest contributions.
Donor-advised
funds have also generated some controversy because of their opacity. Donations
can be made anonymously from the vehicles, and there’s no payout requirement or
deadline.
One
reason the popularity of DAFs has spiked in recent years are changes introduced
by the 2017 tax reform law.
Under
that measure, the standard deduction doubled to $12,400 for individuals and
$24,800 for couples. The higher ceiling, combined with the elimination
and reduction of many itemized deductions, has made it more difficult to earn a
tax break for charitable giving.
A
donor-advised fund often is used to combine several years’ worth of
contributions into one donation that will qualify for a tax break in a
particular year.
Katharine
Earhart, co-founder of Fairlight Advisors, helped clients decide to bunch three
years of donations into a $75,000 contribution to a donor-advised fund. It is
housed at the East Bay Community Foundation, where the clients can help direct
it toward charities in the San Francisco area.
While
the clients are making distribution decisions on charitable donations, the fund
is getting bigger.
“It’s
sort of like a charitable piggy bank where assets can continue to grow
tax-free,” said Ken Nopar, senior philanthropic adviser at the American
Endowment Foundation, a large DAF.
The
timeline from a charitable notion to a donation is fairly short when using
DAFs, said David Bennett, president of the Community Foundation Research and
Training Institute.
“Compared
to a private foundation, it’s a lot easier to set them up and get them going,”
Mr. Bennett said. “Most people can easily achieve their charitable goals
through a DAF.”
Donor-advised
funds also make charitable giving more accessible to those who do not have high
net worth, Ms. Earhart said. “It’s a perfect strategy for the mass affluent and
the affluent.”
Rapid growth
The
widespread use of DAFs is evident in their rapid growth. Total contributions to
DAFs grew by 20% in 2018 to $37.12 billion, according to the National Philanthropic Trust. Those
donations represented 12.7% of all individual giving. A total of $23.42 billion
was granted from DAFs in 2018, up from $19.7 billion in 2017. The total
charitable assets in DAFs was $121.42 billion in 2018, up
from $112.10 billion in 2017.
The
NPF, which estimates there were about 728,563 donor-advised fund accounts in
2018, called them the most active and fastest-growing philanthropic vehicle.
“They’re
absolutely taking off,” said Ann Gill, chief philanthropic officer at Vanguard
Charitable.
Vanguard,
Fidelity and Schwab sponsor donor-advised funds through their charitable
organizations. Fidelity Charitable announced in February that donors
recommended a record $7.3 billion in grants from
their DAFs housed at Fidelity. Also in February, Vanguard Charitable said it
had issued $10 billion in grants since its inception in 1997.
Ms.
Gill touted the low cost, ease of use and flexibility of DAFs. But their value
to financial advisers can also be measured in how they shape client
relationships by catalyzing a discussion about what they want to do with their
money.
“It
takes the conversation to a deeper level,” Ms. Gill said. “You’re able to
connect with them on an emotional basis. They’re not just talking about
rebalancing their portfolio.”
Ms.
Earhart encourages advisers to help their clients “prepare a philanthropic
budget,” she said. “Ask them: What causes are you passionate about? It gives
you another way to talk to your clients and get to know them.”
Important outcome
Helping
a client determine where to direct his or her charitable contributions is one
of the most important outcomes of such conversations, said Peter Lipsett, vice
president of DonorsTrust, a donor-advised fund. For instance, clients who are
more conservative in their political views might want to contribute to Mr.
Lipsett’s fund, which he said does not give money to any organization that
takes money from the government.
“The
more financial advisers understand that there’s this broad spectrum of
providers for DAFs out there, the more their advice can go beyond tax savings
to actually helping the client figure out the guidelines they have for their
philanthropy,” Mr. Lipsett said.
Critics of donor-advised funds say
the vehicles are opaque, allowing those making contributions to hide behind a
veil of anonymity, increasing the chances for self-dealing or contributions to
radical organizations.
But
advisers and other experts say anonymous donations are rare.
“I’ve
worked with hundreds of DAFs; I’ve seen that one or two times,” Mr. Bennett
said.
Another
criticism is that there are no rules governing when payouts must
be made. Money can sit in DAFs for years without being granted.
‘Insufficient data’
“There’s
insufficient data on a per account basis because the sponsoring organizations
only have to file reports on an aggregate basis,” said Ray Madoff, a professor
and director of the Forum on Philanthropy and the Public Good at Boston College
Law School.
Regulatory
or legislative changes may be coming in this area. Recently, the California
legislature considered a a bill that would require DAF payout rates.
Vanguard
Charitable makes donors distribute at least $500 every three years. If they are
inactive, the organization will grant 5% on their behalf.
“I
would not be surprised if we see some kind of minimum payout requirement for
DAFs,” Mr. Bennett said.
Unlike
donations to a foundation, which produces a tax benefit on a cost basis, DAFs
provide a tax break at the fair market value. This creates a problem when much
of the giving to DAFs is in the form of appreciated assets, which can be
complex, rather than cash, Ms. Madoff said.
“These
assets are incredibly difficult to valuate accurately,” she said.
Regardless
of how the assets are priced, when a client decides to put them in a DAF, they
no longer belong to the client and often leave an advisory firm’s
control.
“It’s
not your money anymore,” said Richard Pon, owner of an eponymous CPA and
advisory firm. “I have to keep reminding people of that.”
Managing the money
Many
community foundations as well as the large brokerage DAF sponsors will let
advisers continue to manage the money in a client’s DAF if it is large enough.
But
advisers say they will recommend a DAF to a client if it’s the best way to
facilitate – or launch – their charitable giving, even if it reduces their
assets under management.
“That’s
a great conversation to have with people,” said Gavin Morrissey, managing
partner at FSA Wealth Management. “You’re not selling. This is precisely an
advisory situation. If you’re chasing money over a DAF, you have to rethink the
way you’re running your practice.”
No comments:
Post a Comment