Re-importation of
pharmaceuticals to lower drug prices is a perennial favorite of the campaign
trail. But re-importation has never been the law of the land for a reason: It
won’t work. Eakinomics has made this case again and again.
The basic notions are pretty simple. True, the United States has higher
drug costs than most other developed nations, but largely because of price
controls by foreign governments. This makes it tempting to argue that drugs
should be re-imported back to the United States. Under current law this is
illegal – largely for safety reasons. But the economics don’t add up
either. Those drugs are being sold in the quantities and at the prices that
they are because the government and the consumers want them. Why in the
world would they permit large amounts to go back to the United States, which
would result in either higher prices or rationed access to the drugs? They
would not let it happen, and it will not happen. And from the flip side, why
would a U.S. manufacturer export a large amount of drugs that simply got sent
back to the United States to undercut U.S. contracts? It would not and it will
not.
So I was quite taken aback when Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar announced that
he was directing that "FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb establish a working
group to examine how to safely import prescription drugs from other countries
in the event of a dramatic price increase for a drug produced by one
manufacturer and not protected by patents or exclusivities.”
Notice that this is much more limited than previous re-importation proposals.
It would not apply to those drugs on patent or biologics benefitting from
exclusivity. And re-importation would only be triggered by a “dramatic
price increase” by the sole manufacturer of the drug. Does that change the
basic arguments against re-importation? I don’t think so. The basic safety issues
are no different. And the notion that another country would willingly
permit the re-export of large quantities of a valued drug still does not appear
to be in their self-interest. Count me skeptical.
One might argue that the whole idea is to have a threat available that controls
the behavior of manufacturers tempted to jack up prices. But that threat is
only credible if it can work.
I may be missing something and look forward to seeing what the working group
produces. At least for the moment, re-importation continues to not look like a
panacea for drug pricing concerns.
No comments:
Post a Comment