By John Hilton
January 22, 2019
A Maryland
commission is recommending that a "fiduciary duty standard" be placed
on broker-dealers and insurance agents doing business in the state.
The Maryland
Financial Consumer Protection Commission released its report last week, the
second report in its two years of existence. The latest effort touches on
several areas on consumer protection, including data breaches and auto lending.
But it's the
section on fiduciary duty that has the financial services industry most
concerned. The commission cited the failure to enact financial regulations by
state and federal officials as reasons to get tough on brokers and agents.
"Since (the)
SEC and the state insurance regulators have proposed standards that largely
preserve the status quo, individual states may need to provide greater
protections that investors expect from financial professionals who provide
investment advice," the report reads.
The National
Association of Insurance Commissioners has been trying to do that for the past
year, but its best-interest model law is bogged down in disagreement between
conservative and liberal state officials.
Dueling
Standards
What many in the
industry fear is each state producing their own independent regulations that
are all different in some way. Nevada was the first state to pass increased
standards. New York is on track to enact rules later this year placing all life
insurance and annuity sales under a best interest standard.
The expectation is
that the Maryland will follow with a bill based on the commission
recommendations very soon, said Andrew Remo, legislative affairs director for
the American Retirement Association.
State Sen. James
Rosapepe, D, introduced a bill extending the fiduciary duty standard last year,
but parts of it were tabled after financial industry lobbyists raised concerns.
A Rosapepe aide said the senator will soon introduce a bill based on the latest
commission report.
The ARA was one of
those groups that met with Rosapepe. The same concerns remain, Remo said.
In particular, the
concern that any bill will be in conflict with the pre-emption clause in the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. Section 514 of ERISA
provides that ERISA supersedes any and all state laws insofar as they relate to
any employee benefit plan.
So far, Maryland
officials have not shown "any sort of acknowledgement of the fact
that ERISA advice is already subject to a federal fiduciary standard,"
Remo explained.
Other states are
also writing bills that conflict with the pre-emption clause, Remo said. States
such as Nevada and New Jersey are working on their own fiduciary or
best-interest regulations.
“Ultimately, I
think if states continue to ignore that, I think there’s a strong legal case to
be made that there needs to be a carve-out here for ERISA plans,” Remo said.
InsuranceNewsNet Senior Editor John Hilton has covered business
and other beats in more than 20 years of daily journalism. John may be reached
at john.hilton@innfeedback.com.
Follow him on Twitter @INNJohnH.
© Entire
contents copyright 2018 by InsuranceNewsNet.com Inc. All rights reserved. No
part of this article may be reprinted without the expressed written consent
from InsuranceNewsNet.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment