Population
health improves when communities add more primary care providers, but the
looming shortage of PCPs may curtail these clinical gains.
February 26,
2019 - A higher number of primary care providers (PCPs) in a given
region is associated with significant gains in life expectancy for resident
populations, according to a new study published
in JAMA Internal Medicine.
Adding just 10 PCPs
per 100,000 individuals was associated with a 51.5-day increase in life
expectancy across the population, with significant reductions in mortality
related to common chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease, cancer, and
respiratory conditions.
With an extra 10 PCPs
per 100,000, deaths from cardiovascular disease decreased by 30.4 deaths per
million; cancer mortality dropped by 23.6 deaths per million; and respiratory
mortality by 8.8 deaths per million.
The study, conducted
by researchers from top institutions including Stanford University, Harvard,
and UNC Chapel Hill, reconfirms the prevailing wisdom that primary care
providers are critical for the prevention and
management of chronic conditions.
“The largest
decreases in cause-specific mortality associated with increased primary care
physician density were for cardiovascular disease, cancer, and respiratory
tract disease, conditions with strong evidence of amenability to primary care
management or with delayed mortality conditional on early screening through
primary care,” the study stated.
However, the uneven
distribution of PCPs between urban and rural areas, as well as a steady overall
decline in new physicians choosing to enter primary care, are putting stress on
populations that do not have adequate access to fundamental services.
“Although the total
number of primary care physicians has increased in the United States, owing to
disproportionate rural losses and general population size increases, the
distribution of US primary care physicians per 100,000 population has changed,
leading to a net loss in mean primary care physician supply at the county
level,” the study explained.
“The mean density of
primary care physicians relative to population size decreased from 46.6 per
100,000 population to 41.4 per 100,000 population, with greater losses in rural
areas.”
The Association of
American Medical Colleges (AAMC) predicts that the nation may be
facing a shortage of close to 50,000 PCPs by 2030, contributing to an overall
shortfall of physician talent that could have dire implications for an aging,
growing population.
The researchers note
that dramatic disparities in compensation between primary care and specialty
care are luring physicians away from the general practice environment, leading
to a problematic shortage of PCPs.
A recent survey from Medscape found a
45 percent differential in compensation between PCPs and specialists, equating
to nearly $100,000 a year in “lost” revenue for PCPs.
While the shortage of
PCPs is leading to a modest increase in salary for those
who stay in the primary care environment, the wage gap may simply be too wide
for physicians to feel comfortable leaving so much money on the table.
The healthcare
industry is deploying a number of different strategies to help close gaps in
primary care access for patients.
One popular tactic is
the use of team-based care, which leverages advanced practice practitioners
(APPs) such as nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) to
provide routine services and expand availability.
The JAMA
Internal Medicine study was not able to examine the impact of nurse
practitioners or physician assistants on population health due to
inconsistencies in the data used for the model.
But other data from
the industry indicates that NPs and PAs can indeed have a positive impact on
access to chronic disease management, preventive care, and routine services.
The American
Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANP) notes that the number of NPs is
at an all time high, with close to 248,000 licensed professionals currently in
practice.
Unlike physicians,
the vast majority of NPs and physician assistants choose to practice in the
primary care environment, added a separate study from UnitedHealth
Group (UHG). Seventy-eight percent of APPs work in primary care compared
to just one-third of physicians, the 2018 data revealed.
By 2025, the number
of NPs in the primary care environment is expected to increase by 47 percent,
UHG said, and PAs are anticipated to increase by 38 percent.
As a result, these
professionals may help reduce the shortage of primary care providers by 70
percent.
However, physicians
will always play a vital role in the primary care environment, and APPs cannot
close all of the gaps produced by the dearth of MDs.
A growing number of
medical schools are currently taking the lead in encouraging new graduates to
enter primary care, and are working to address the financial aspects of doing
so.
NYU and Kaiser
Permanente are both launching brand new medical
schools with free tuition. Both organizations will promote a population
health approach to care – the new NYU Long Island School of Medicine is
specifically designed to train primary care providers.
Helping students
graduate without crushing debts may make it easier for new physicians to choose
a slightly less lucrative career path in the primary care setting, the medical
schools theorize.
However, it will
likely take much broader investment in primary care to
close the gulf for patients, the JAMA Internal Medicine researchers asserted.
“Policy initiatives,
such as Medicare’s Accountable Care Organization programs, that attempt to
focus on population health and spending and thereby rely on primary care
physicians continue to gain traction, but these programs fail to explicitly
direct more resources to primary care physician supply, instead relying on the
usual Medicare fee schedule,” the study says.
“Other forms of
investment, such as the National Health Services Corps, the Teaching Health
Centers program, and Title VII programs, also offer the opportunity to increase
the density of primary care physicians, especially in underserved areas.”
“Whether these
initiatives will encourage more graduating medical students to enter primary
care remains to be seen.”
https://healthitanalytics.com/news/for-better-population-health-invest-in-primary-care-providers?eid=CXTEL000000460294&elqCampaignId=8904&elqTrackId=86f8dbc00ac34552991ccd3c7d3d05f1&elq=a3c6a1020ce3426dbbf5d8112667153f&elqaid=9369&elqat=1&elqCampaignId=8904
No comments:
Post a Comment