Next
Steps for the Fed
The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) begins a 2-day meeting today
that will be capped off by a statement, economic forecasts, and
interest-rate projections tomorrow at 2:00 p.m. and a press conference by
Fed Chairman Jerome Powell a half-hour later.
Of primary importance is the outlook for the economy, which has suffered
somewhat recently from slowing growth, fluctuations in consumer
confidence and business investment, and chaotic fiscal (e.g., government
shutdowns) and trade policies. But coming in a close second will be the
outlook for future interest rate hikes (or not), as summarized by the
so-called “dot plot” that summarizes 19 individual projections for
interest rates. Each dot is one member’s expected value of the federal
funds rate – the policy rate – in the future. The dot plot from December
is reproduced below (thanks to Bloomberg
for providing a readable version).
The dot plot was introduced in 2011 as a way to provide guidance to
financial markets about the future of interest rates, reduce policy
uncertainty, and convey the Fed’s intention to keep rates low (zero,
actually) in the aftermath of the financial crisis.
Now that the Fed has gotten back into the business of raising rates, the
dot plot has moved from an effective tool of communication to a potential
source of
confusion. The essence of the problem is this: what does the
plot above tell us about the future of the federal funds rate? It has
been common to interpret the median of the projected rates (the green
line, above) as “the” Fed forecast.
In December, this implied two more rate increases in 2019. However, only
3 members would have to cut their projections to reduce the median to one
rate increase; 7 changes put the median at standing pat. Would it really
be accurate to say that “the Fed” changed its outlook if only 3 of 19
people did so?
The outcome of the Fed meeting will be of greater than average interest.
But it is probably more important to listen to what the statement and
Chairman say than to ponder the dots too closely.
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment