I’m sure you noticed it —
that subtle hint of something different and unusual, even extraordinary, in the
air. No, the Fed has not returned to zero rates, quantitative easing, and other
“extraordinary” monetary policies. Instead, on March 2 the federal debt limit
snapped back into place and the U.S. Treasury immediately began using its
“extraordinary measures” to keep the debt under the limit.
Ok, you didn’t notice. That’s good because it means no disruption has occurred.
Here is what is going on.
By law there is a limit on federal debt (where federal debt, roughly speaking, is the total of
debt issued to the public and federal agencies). Under the Bipartisan Budget
Act of 2018, the debt limit was suspended through March 1, 2019, at which time
the new limit automatically became the amount of debt outstanding. Now the
Treasury has to live with the new cap (which is a bit north of $22 trillion).
In broad terms, the way it does this is to stop issuing Treasuries to federal
agencies, which allows it to issue more to borrow from the public. In
particular, the Treasury can stop issuing Treasuries to the Thrift Savings
Plan’s “G Fund,” which is a retirement program for federal workers;
suspend funding the exchange Stabilization Fund, a pool of funds in
Treasury that is a legacy of the fixed exchange rate era; and stop giving
securities to the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund and
the Postal Service Retiree Health Benefits Fund. These so-called extraordinary
measures can keep the debt under the limit to the August-September time period.
But the extraordinary measures eventually run out, and the debt limit must
ultimately be raised (or suspended). Failure to do so would mean that the
Treasury could not borrow to make good on the interest and principal on
previous borrowing — a default. Default on Treasuries would undermine the safe investment
that is the foundation of liquidity in the global financial system and have
profound negative impacts on the global economy. It is unthinkable.
How will the debt limit get raised? There are two, related aspects to this
question. The first is the process for raising the debt limit. Usually, it
would require passing legislation in the regular fashion through the House and
Senate. But upon taking control of the House, the Democrats instituted a new
rule with the following feature: If the House passes a budget resolution, then
passage automatically triggers sending a House-passed debt limit suspension
bill to the Senate. In that circumstance, the Senate could take up the bill,
pass it, and send it to the president for signature. Voila! Problem solved.
Not so fast. The second aspect is what policy content will be required to raise
or suspend the limit. The scenario outlined above is a “clean” suspension, but
such clean increases or suspensions are historically the exception and not the rule. Instead,
part of the price of raising the debt limit is usually provisions designed to
force Congress to be more fiscally prudent in the future. If enough members of
the House or Senate require this, then passage requires regular order and not
the expedited procedure under House rules.
The debt limit will soon fade from the national consciousness, and the
extraordinary sense in the air will return to the mundane. But in a matter of
months, the debt limit will be front and center.
No comments:
Post a Comment