Drew Altman, Kaiser Family
Foundation Jun 25, 2019
The most important detail to watch in the regulations for President Trump's executive
order on price transparency for hospitals: will they require
that insurers give consumers information on out of pocket costs in a timely and
usable way?
Why it matters: That kind of
timely information will be needed in the regulations — which have yet to be
written — so consumers can shop based on the costs they will actually pay.
The big picture: One big reason
general information on prices has only limited utility to consumers is that
what they most want to know is not the price of an MRI, or a knee replacement
of any other service at this hospital or that, but what they will have to pay
for it themselves out of pocket under their insurance plan.
Some insurance companies have tools consumers can use to figure
this out, but that information is not easily available to consumers today. As a
recent Kaiser Family Foundation/Los
Angeles Times survey shows:
- 67% of the American people say it is
somewhat or very difficult for them to figure out what a treatment or
procedure will cost them.
- 44%
said they had difficulty determining what they would actually have to pay.
- 40%
had problems figuring out what was even covered.
Even with the right information, larger medical expenditures generally
occur when people are in a medical crisis of some kind, in anything but
shopping mode, and generally dependent on their physicians to direct them to
hospitals, specialists or tests they need. This is why price transparency and
shopping is helpful for some services but not a panacea.
- It’s not entirely clear whether low rates
of price shopping today reflect the lack of price and quality information,
or larger barriers to shopping in health care. Just 17 percent of people
with typical deductibles shop today, and 21% with high deductible
plans. More price transparency will drive these numbers up, but
how much is unknown.
- On
the other hand, there is some evidence that people want to shop when they
can: 47%, for example, asked for a generic drug to save money in the past
year; and 36% checked with a provider or health plan on the cost of an
office visit.
- But
just 23% used an online tool to compare provider costs. All told, 70%
reported some shopping-like behavior in the survey.
It's important to add that the ability to shop based on price is
not equally distributed throughout the population. If you are in a rural area,
limited to a narrow network of providers, or dependent on emergency rooms or
clinics, you may have very limited options to shop around.
The bottom line: Like putting
price information in drug ads, the executive order may not have much impact in
terms of actually lowering prices, but it will focus greater attention on high
medical prices. That is likely the main reason for industry resistance, and
potentially its greatest contribution.
No comments:
Post a Comment